Education is one of the most effective tools in building a nation for socio-economical and cultural benefits.However, education at times is highly co-related to the ideologies, a student imbibes during his teen, pre-mature years and the credibility of the sources of education he acquires.The issue suggests that there should be free education for students who are admitted to universities without any sufficient financial support. In my opinion, I partially agree with the statement owing to multiple factors.
Providing free edcuation to poor students might seem as a good step by critics, but deciding the financial status or the threshold for consideration in giving the scholarships, could be a daunting task for the government. Adding to this, incentives and scholarships are more fruitful when given to students who are diligent, committed to get education in the most formal way and are worth the "investment" done by the government. For example, let's take a scenario where a poor student and a middle class student gets accepted to the university. Here, the poor student will avail scholarship anyway, without any factor of grades or knowledge coming into consideraton. On the other hand, the middle class student, inspite of having such great academic background cannot get this. He should need some impetus for government as a mode of encouragement to do good for the society. But only because of financial superiority taken into factor, the more deserving students could be devoid of any such financial help. So, deciding of giving scholarship only to poor students in such cases would mean sheer injustice to the real deserving ones.
Having said that, I am not biased over the fact that only level of competence should be taken into comparison. One of the more plausible scenarios could be also possible that, giving such support to the weaker section would bring out individuals that are capable enough who will shoot their lives towards prosperity by being sedulous and focused. One of the good measures for such scenarios would be implementing a sytem where in a student irrespective of his economic background has to take a set of standardized tests, that would incorporate certain weightage to the test results as well as their financial stability.This "set" would also undermine the well-known counter argument that "a single examination cannot ascribe to a candidate's proficiency". In today's world, standardized tests are being conducted by various governments around the world, not only for underscoring certain candidates for their performance, but also to refine out the cream of the student population in prestigious institutes for the pursuit of education.
Giving free education to students as stated in the discussions above would definitely boost students' morale and act as a sign of the support of education system on such students to graduate with flying colors.However, setting the number of students who will avail these scholarhsip would also probably burn a hole in the pockets for the government. Providing scholarships are not only dependent on the ability of students, but also depends on teh financial stability of the government. For an instance, if poor countries of Africa - where more than half of the population is living under the thresholds of poverty - are allowed to attain such scholarships, the government might become bankrupt in itself. And if the government inadvertently without any malevolent intentions, suddenly stops the scholarship programme, due to lack of financial reserves, would incite a lot of upcoming university students to insatiation. This would further dicourage them to achieve any more education thereafter. However, countries like India, China, United States have abundant of such reserves and a strong economy to burden the pressure of providing poor learners, free means of education.
With an overview, I would say that giving financial support and underwrite some poor category would be a welcome move by all. But it also depends on the sustainability of the country's economy by such investments.Only giving scholarships to lure the weaker section with charlant attitudes might not affect the government's stability in the shorter run, but might cause a lot of regret and struggle for the governments in continuing such philanthropic programmes.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 16
- Government should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- 'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the 89
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... socio-economical and cultural benefits.However, education at times is highly co-relate...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...of the sources of education he acquires.The issue suggests that there should be fre...
^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ets take a scenario where a poor student and a middle class student gets accepted...
^^
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ts as well as their financial stability.This 'set' would also undermine th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 744, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a candidate' or simply 'candidates'?
Suggestion: a candidate; candidates
...;a single examination cannot ascribe to a candidates proficiency'. In todays world, sta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 745, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a single examination cannot ascribe to a candidates proficiency'. In todays ...
^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...students to graduate with flying colors.However, setting the number of students who wil...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Only
...he countrys economy by such investments.Only giving scholarships to lure the weaker ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 310, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...charlant attitudes might not affect the governments stability in the shorter run, but might...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, however, if, so, well, as to, for example, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 98.0 58.6224719101 167% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 12.9106741573 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3681.0 2235.4752809 165% => OK
No of words: 681.0 442.535393258 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40528634361 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.10842213422 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20287479472 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 330.0 215.323595506 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484581497797 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 1149.3 704.065955056 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.503201941 60.3974514979 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.318181818 118.986275619 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9545454545 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210311484814 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619165955551 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608307826307 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133614807405 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802068584625 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 14.1392134831 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 179.0 100.480337079 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.7820224719 178% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.