Government should place few,if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Scientific research and development are important to the world. Conclusions depended on these findings to help to get a better understanding of the world in general. Sometimes these analyses without placing any restrictions can be harmful to the scientist and to the world.
The government should place a few restrictions on scientific research because sometimes the researchers get involved in the experiment they forget that for these experiments funding is being provided and they should carry out within those funding. Due to the no-restriction policy in China, the whole world had to face the most dangerous pandemic in their lives which was COVID-19. Due to lack of attention, the virus was released to the world. If careful practices and rules had been followed by the scientists the widespread of the epidemic could have been avoided.
On the other hand, science is an open experiment because of the theories and hypotheses of some of the great scientists, the perspective and understanding of the world has been changed. Due to these large minds today the world knows about gravity, motion about different types of other famous results. If the government had put a restriction, today we wouldn't be able to understand the processes and we wouldn't been able to create advanced technology and new developments in STEM with the help of earlier conclusions.
Thus one must realise that it is recommended to keep few restrictions because they will remember the regulations and they won't cross their boundaries and experiment within their reach.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 92, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cause of the theories and hypotheses of some of the great scientists, the perspective and u...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 353, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ernment had put a restriction, today we wouldnt be able to understand the processes and...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 404, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...able to understand the processes and we wouldnt been able to create advanced technology...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ith the help of earlier conclusions. Thus one must realise that it is recommended...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 250.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.244 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96708611267 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7240514491 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.181818182 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2617852439 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909209950004 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121767509148 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143628951923 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088311170565 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.