“Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.”
Some people might think that the government should not intervene in any kind of scientific research, such action might cause some important breakthrough from not happening. I think some restriction over the research is helpful and needed to prevent any form of tragedy from happening.
Those contend we should trust the science and let it develop on its own, then some game-changing breakthrough might happen and bring good to society. However, what they do not think of is that what if scientists go too far? what if they become crazy as they study deeper and deeper? For example, the first clone pig surprised the globe with the signal saying that we humans can challenge the god and create animals out of nowhere. However, we have been hearing that some scientists have continued trying to clone humans, which is terrifying, thus we add restrictions on cloning technology.
Further, nuclear science is dangerous, what if scientists do not know the boundaries and implement some treacherous experiments inside their labs? Maybe the radiation will leak and cause disasters at large scales, or maybe they utilize the technology as weapons that will cause harm to society? All these things are worth concerning that if scientists go too far, what will come afterward? Thus, it is necessary for us to put restrictions on scientific research, it is not to impede science growth, it is to supervise if scientists go out of control.
However, the rule cannot be too restricted, or it will sure restrain the scientific growth, so the restrictions are supposed to be the boundary of how far can the scientists go, for instance, the limit of cloning technology is that we cannot clone a whole person, an organ is fine, but not a whole human being. This is the boundary that separates the craziness and actual scientific development, says, once we all stay in the line, then there should not be any restriction on us.
All in all, I contend that if we let scientists do everything they want, surely something great might happen, but tragedies might also come along, so it is necessary to put restrictions on scientific research for the good of whole mankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positio 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- 4 Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home appliances such as refrigerators and air conditioners that are almost twice as energy efficient as thos 50
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
... is that what if scientists go too far? what if they become crazy as they study deep...
^^^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nimals out of nowhere. However, we have been hearing that some scientists have continued try...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93939393939 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77988597154 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509641873278 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8205104331 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.071428571 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195614570538 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696152880193 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075598559163 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11814300046 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703226363832 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.