Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
The author claims that government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. I strongly disagree with the statement. One can also rewrite the statement as, the government will provide financial support to the major cities and in return they should preserve the nation's cultural traditions.
First point here is, major cities in any country do not preserve nation's cultural traditions. In fact cities plays the major role in alteration of the nation's cultural traditions and values. All the major cities have a lot impact of modernization. For example the major cities in India are all influenced by western culture, which in fact is modernization according to the native people of cities, and in the process they almost forgot about the traditional values and culture of the country. Second point is, cities are not the only place where culture is preserved. The rural area of the country is the actual place where traditions and cultural values are kept live. Every person in rural areas celebrates the traditions.
I agree with the fact that government should provide all the financial support to the cities, but that is because the cities have all the industries, all sort of business and good education system which helps people to be independent, to grow financially as well as morally and it also affect the economy of the country. Financial support from government is the key factor in the development of the nation.
Finally, off course the financial support from government is necessary for major cities of the country, but it is for overall development of the nation and not for the preserving the traditional values. The place where traditional values are kept alive is the rural area of the country and government should not ignore the this fact when it comes to supporting financially to various parts of the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-18 | zanzendegi | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | zanzendegi | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | zanzendegi | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | Tendo407 | 50 | view |
| 2022-07-26 | pappu97cu | 50 | view |
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
... because it is primarily in cities that a nations cultural traditions are preserved and g...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...al areas celebrates the traditions. I agree with the fact that government should provide all the finan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...ancially as well as morally and it also affect the economy of the country. Financial s...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...ountry and government should not ignore the this fact when it comes to supporting financ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, second, so, well, for example, in fact, sort of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06097560976 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6815943892 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.42987804878 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.3217576994 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.571428571 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535375210113 0.243740707755 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195109911801 0.0831039109588 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.209218410226 0.0758088955206 276% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343420656969 0.150359130593 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.207120461699 0.0667264976115 310% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.