Every decision the governments make on the policy affects the citizens’ lives. How do they tackle these problems appositely without calling forth outrageous mob? One such approach is to resolve the conundrum at hand, and neglect the problems that might rise up in the future. Another proposes that they having foresight and probe into the issues which could ruin the blessing future. Frankly speaking, I suppose that it would be appropriate to substantiate both of them simultaneously.
Focusing on problems which have already happened may apparently prolong the extant of the country. By doing so, can the authorities not only solve the issue that jeopardizes the public, but also allows the people to consider that the governments’ sparing no effort in national affair, and thus cater to the demand of the civilians. Especially, when the nation is in a state of emergency, handling the current issue would probably be the top priority. As long as the problem is straightened out, the plebs would be grateful of their government, and thus more willing to vote for the ruling party. Consequently, it is a matter of commonsense to deal with immediate problems of today as a part of the governments.
On the other hand, trying to fathom out the anticipated problems of the future is necessary for that doing so may abase the severity of the future issue. For instance, while the world is tormented by the acute malady ‘coronavirus’, the government of Taiwan had been prepared beforehand, eventually protected thousands of lives from being menaced under the jeopardy. If the upcoming conundrum had been not taken seriously, at the end of the day, the country might still vanish because of the quandary being too severe to remain unsolved.
To assure the safety of a country, it is essential to maintain both the measures. If it does not fulfill any one of the two aspects, it may leave the country at risk. For example, if a nation only takes account of recent problems and ignore those potential ones, the country might ultimately perish as soon as the quandary burst out. Therefore, it is not only crucial to cope with the perplexity in front of us, but urgent not to evade those inevitable ones.
To sum up, I maintain the essence of tackling immediate and anticipating problems at the same time. First, it elongates the life span of the nation. In addition, only by functioning both at work can we ensure the safety of the country. Thus, both of them are indispensable when governing a country.
- Some people believe it is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed 58
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, first, frankly, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i suppose, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93853427896 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83201316278 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562647754137 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4691153865 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4761904762 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38095238095 5.21951772744 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168875634264 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457150456086 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502967125244 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086209913171 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041727925053 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.