In a democratic society, political leaders are elected from us electorates. It is necessary to inform most of the information which may directly affects citizen. Without making it public, how can we assure the rights of the people? The statement whether the policies should be withheld from the public is discussed as followed.
Apparently, it is true that protecting information from people is a good way of avoiding unnecessary doubts which may cause considerable disquiet between citizens. For example, the regime in China has always been in a steady position, for none of their people would ever be skeptical of whatever policy the government makes. The citizens have full faith in their government, hence there are seldom riots raised in the society.
However, this would not always be the exception. As long as the policy they withhold affects the people’s rights, sitting and waiting for a good outcome would not be their choice. Instead of expecting the government to guarantee their benefit, citizens would rather standup and protect themselves. For instance, the pandemic disease, coronavirus, which flood around the world is the result of withholding information from the public, and consequently lead to an irremediable situation.
Another point is that some might propose sealing information a way of protecting the country itself. Once a confidential information is leaked, the country then turns into an emergency state. Nevertheless, if only the discloser of the tidings would not endanger the security of the nation, in my opinion, the information should still be revealed. Only through knowing them can we protect our rights from being invaded.
The security of each country should be placed in first with no doubt. Yet, the right of every citizen is also what we should never overlook. We have the ruling authority to better our lives, not to ruin our future. Hence, I hold that the public has the right to be informed appropriately.
- Some people believe it is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed 58
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, consequently, first, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, for example, for instance, no doubt, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21835443038 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82698749129 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579113924051 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4667356386 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7894736842 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6315789474 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57894736842 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317386747327 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948549452984 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716413618687 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180240929086 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713826757442 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.