Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.
Military of a nation is necessary to care of its security from foreign enimies as well is internal threats and is inevitable part of an nation's investment. And art is what is required for a civilized society, it represents culture, demographic and in one way can be stated as identity of the country. In a gist, Art is part of nation/s identity and identity of a nation is what military protects.
So it is necessary to give considerable emphasis on spending in both military and art, but the proportion in which investment is to be done by the government largely depends on parameters such as period od nation development, threat from enemies etc.
A country which is torn apart by war and/or is prone to war like situation which can pose threat to national security need to spend more on military. So, this is all about priorities. The country with relative less prone to war and chaos, can focus on other aspects such as art. Many other situation such as a country which is in initial stages of development and has a weak military force would push funding towards military rather than arts where as a country with well developed military force can think of strengthening the art aspect.
Moreover, military spending is generally solely from the government whereas art is field which is promoted and supported many times by individual groups interested in art. So the multiple sources of art funding partially obviates the need of art spending by government tantamount to military spending.
Last but not the least, it is well known that military equipments are very expensive to buy and build and in genral require largest proportion of a nation GDP. If the author qualifies the argument by replacing the word 'invest' with emphasize, the recommendation would sound more reasonable because even equal emphasis in both the areas would require more monetry spending on military due to its sophisticated equipments and peculiar requirements.
Although the author, through the recommendation, which tries to support equal spending in art and military by 'Government', empathizes with lovers and admirers of art, the recommendation can not be considered universal and depends on nation to nation.
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military. 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 69
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 26
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ernal threats and is inevitable part of an nations investment. And art is what is ...
^^
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...al threats and is inevitable part of an nations investment. And art is what is required...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...nding towards military rather than arts where as a country with well developed military ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'require the largest'.
Suggestion: require the largest
...xpensive to buy and build and in genral require largest proportion of a nation GDP. If the auth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03296703297 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90886718018 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497252747253 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8843581508 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.923076923 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13991765958 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579640191196 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483318111135 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08443983717 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509301917244 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.