Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
The author of the statement claims that government should not support any research which their result is ambiguous. While others believe that every project ought to support through government even their outcome is not explicit. I do not agree with this claim. Consider the both views and what follows, my point would be delineated.
To begin with, all of us know that there is a variety matter that their result is not transparent. As a matter of fact, some science such as Space mission which is considerably imperative for community and their result is unclear. Provided that governments do not support it, the country will confront a plethora challenge without a shadow of doubt. As we all know that space mission would be worth for the earth future due to their ability for predicting weather of globe and determining the water of the sea in the future and so forth. Inasmuch as, some satellite might be lead to fall there is risky task for supporting this project.
Furthermore, there is a considerable number majors in the university which their consequence is not obvious like gen biology. This matter is highly beneficial as long as they had a strong patronage. One of the striking examples that is corresponds to this issue, one of my friend was greatly avid for investigation in biological project, while this matter needs to a plethora money for arriving a desirable output. Since their last result was not apparent, anyone did not support it. Hence, this project failed. Nevertheless, as long as this project that it was related to healthy was supported through university or government it achieved a superb result. This indicates that taking a tremendous amount of heed to some topic that is pertaining to health would be considerably beneficial and useful.
Notwithstanding, all of us know that budget of government is greatly limited. Indeed, want of adequate money has led to devoid of patronage in scientific search. Inasmuch as, expert ought to allocate a considerably amount of money for eradicating poverty in the society which is immensely imperative and pivotal for advance of earth. By considering this fact, allotting an excessive amount of money for some matters that their result is very clear would be behooving.
By taking into account, there is a variety matter such as destitution that their result is obvious. Government should invest it. In spite of the fact that space science and medicine knowledge is significant most of times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | skjasharif | 50 | view |
- 1. As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertising 23
- Personal History Statement---1 70
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Reason: It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs are not 30
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...search which their result is ambiguous. While others believe that every project ought...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('considerably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('amount') instead of another adjective.
.... Inasmuch as, expert ought to allocate a considerably amount of money for eradicating poverty in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 208, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the times') or simply say ''most times''.
Suggestion: most of the times; most times
...e and medicine knowledge is significant most of times.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, so, while, such as, as a matter of fact, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06112469438 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79754471257 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501222493888 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0382943379 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7826086957 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981032996647 0.243740707755 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351254481341 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629745040461 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650252343794 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424194941316 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.