Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
There has always been a debate when it comes to funding of the scientific research in society and more so if we do not know the consequences as many people are of the opinion that these funding's are a waste of money that could feed several mouths and could be put to some humanitarian purpose.
While there are cases when the outcomes are unclear and may not be beneficial for that field anymore, however, these findings can used in some other fields. For example, the touchscreen of the mobile phone was invented in a chemical laboratory and now has become a part to our daily lives. Even with unknown consequences, we may be able to better understand the world. For example, if we send a satellite in space that cost us billions of dollars, and we came to know that the satellite will never return to us. But there is a possibility that some another alien life form found it and decoded our message and they came looking for us. Can you imagine the breakthrough that our mankind achieved ? However, there is also a possibility that consequences could be devastating. Like the case of Chernobyl where the nuclear power plant exploded while testing it. The explosion cost millions and took many lives. Even the next generations of those affected
are suffering from its side effects.
Examples above suggest that even while the consequences are unclear, there are pros are cons to both of them but there we are a competitive human race who like challenges and it is in our nature to be curious, so hindering that curiosity could also be damaging if we stop research out of fear of not knowing its consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | skjasharif | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 951, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the next generations of those affected are suffering from its side effects. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Are
...e next generations of those affected are suffering from its side effects. E...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 12.9106741573 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 2235.4752809 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 284.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71126760563 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63944088766 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55985915493 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.1480328604 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105114959272 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303260029683 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508352460885 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070637828323 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643430456379 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.