Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Education is one of the basic rights of every human being in this earth. Poverty should not impede a person from getting proper education. To have a better and secure life higher education plays an important role. So I agree with the statement that government should offer free university education for those who cannot afford university.
First and foremost, higher education helps a person to explore a particular field that suits him/her. After passing secondary school a person leave his/her teenage and enter into adulthood. So, going to university helps a person to know different type of people and see the world differently. Of course university is a must for a person to become prudent in a particular field, but is also helps a person flourish as a better person. When a person get admitted into a university it means he/she passed some criteria provided by the university. So, only because of lack of money it a student has to drop out, it will be a loss for the university as well.
Furthermore, there are a glut of students who have talent to do something in their life but they are lagging behind because they cannot afford university. Poverty cannot be the reason to be a barrier between talent and a person’s future. So if the government offers any scholarship or waiver that will help a person to continue university and get a proper education. Moreover, by having more talented people in a country it will also help the government as scholar people are the asset of a nation.
On the contrary, if the government offer WAIVER to every person who’s facing financial problem it can be a loss project sometimes. There can be students who are not so into study or there come to university only because of free waiver then it will be of not good for the person as well as the government. So to get any type of scholarship there has to be some criteria that a student has to pass and that will reflect how well deserved that candidate is.
Finally, free education offer can be beneficial for those who are deprived from one of the basic needs of life. From the very starting of the development of a nation, every leader has been working on the fact that education should be open for all. So, I agree with this statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | KarinaShine | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | stevewang1007 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
- Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high-quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our popular alpaca overcoat. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. Given the outcry from 69
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 63
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnersh 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'gluts'?
Suggestion: gluts
...ty as well. Furthermore, there are a glut of students who have talent to do somet...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, then, well, as to, of course, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68939393939 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64952306119 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5974701429 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.85 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313527604178 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970803541416 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099800573484 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194323308604 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651828491208 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.