Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement attempts to state that, government should not obstruct scientific research by placing frequent restriction rather can apply a few in need. It is true that, research activity can not be taken out perfectly, while encumbered with restrictions, but at the same time government have the right and should restrict some of the research for the shake of the nation, for mankind.
Technological advancement and any breakthrough in any field of scientific research is the result of collaboration between the government and private organizations. Without government assistant ship in some crucial moment, research activities are not possible. For example, if we look at NASA, CERN, the level of advancement they are making everyday, mostly attributed to the government assistant ship. Without sanction from the government, the level of experiment, what they are doing for decades would not have been possible. So, if government places restriction on research activities, defines the research objective, sanction certain experiment, than the whole structure will be in a standstill. Without government backup, exploration of the moon, Mars, Pluto would not have been possible, without monetary sanction in mega research projects, maybe gravitational wave detection would not have been possible that early. So, for the advancement and innovation, government should not impose restriction like: what type of experiment should be done?, what type of result is expected?
On the other hand, government can not just reluctantly allow all type of experiments and research. Sometimes, rules and regulations are necessary to make sure whether the research activity, which is ongoing is for the good of civilization, for humankind. For example, If American government have placed restriction on building nuclear bomb during WWII, Japan would not have to face the destruction in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Sometimes, government should restrict controversial experiments to keep peace with other countries.
To conclude, it is undeniable that restriction thwarts development no matter what it is from government or private organizations. But as government is the main driving force of large projects, any mega project, restriction should be kept within a reasonable limit to allow the scientist work freely, to bring out the best of an research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | muthukrishna | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 16 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of video rental stores.“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are f 58
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 40
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 70
- Chemists have determined that spring water from Augusta, Maine contains minerals necessary for a healthy body. Residents of Augusta, Maine, have a longer life span than the average U.S. citizen. Even though spring water from Augusta, Maine may be expensiv 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ment have the right and should restrict some of the research for the shake of the nation, f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...he level of advancement they are making everyday, mostly attributed to the government as...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced restriction on building nuclear bomb during WWII, Japan would not have to fac...
^^
Line 6, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'thwarts'' or 'thwart's'?
Suggestion: thwarts'; thwart's
...lude, it is undeniable that restriction thwarts development no matter what it is from g...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 325, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t work freely, to bring out the best of an research.
^^
Line 6, column 325, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...t work freely, to bring out the best of an research.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'while', 'for example', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.285012285012 0.240241500013 119% => OK
Verbs: 0.12285012285 0.157235817809 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0835380835381 0.0880659088768 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.04914004914 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.014742014742 0.0444667217837 33% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137592137592 0.12292977631 112% => OK
Participles: 0.034398034398 0.0406280797675 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.12331493946 2.79330140395 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.019656019656 0.030933414821 64% => OK
Particles: 0.004914004914 0.0016655270985 295% => OK
Determiners: 0.0835380835381 0.0997080785238 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.034398034398 0.0249443105267 138% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.012285012285 0.0148568991511 83% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2340.0 2732.02544248 86% => OK
No of words: 355.0 452.878318584 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.59154929577 6.0361032391 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.405633802817 0.366273622748 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.352112676056 0.280924506359 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.292957746479 0.200843997647 146% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.219718309859 0.132149295362 166% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12331493946 2.79330140395 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518309859155 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 55.3532837318 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6666666667 23.380412469 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2437739409 59.4972553346 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 141.124799967 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 23.380412469 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 58.8779342723 51.4728631049 114% => OK
Elegance: 2.44736842105 1.64882698954 148% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305653612827 0.391690518653 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120701529924 0.123202303941 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.067561311967 0.077325440228 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.560141495111 0.547984918172 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123683742223 0.149214159877 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139729751852 0.161403998019 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641054100032 0.0892212321368 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.388730172225 0.385218514788 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0835575348609 0.0692045440612 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228340406535 0.275328986314 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514393924666 0.0653680567796 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.