Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Whether or not they would like to accept it, the governments do play a significant role in the progress and development of scientific research in any sovereign state. It is hence imperative that they carefully draft and implement the rules and regulations such that neither scientific progress is impeded, nor is it given a free hand which might lead to severe ethical and moral violations. In my opinion, the governing body of the state must enforce restrictions wherever necessary, be it the scientific community or even the market.
Scientific progress in no doubt a metric that adds bonus points to the meritocracy of a nation. However, we at no point should support any leaps in research that comes at the cost of inhumanity. We should acknowledge at least one species has been taken for granted much of the development in biology over the past century. We have even coined the expression "lab rat" as a label for the species of mice. Why were mice the chosen ones? They were ready available and existed in large populations.
We should understand that the scientific institutions will become an independent entity as soon as no restrictions will be imposed on them. Drugs and many other hazardous substances could easily be transferred / ordered in 'the name of science and research'. There are few examples from human history that provide an optimistic narrative in the absence of any laws or rules.
It may be argued that dependency on the government regulations might slow down the scientific progress by a factor. However, one can only imagine the ramifications if say human based trials were implemented in masses. A risk of plague, a virus outbreak, the probability of disaster is very high here, and this is just talking about biology.
All in all, the laws and restrictions pertaining to scientific research and development b governments are a complex issue and the answer is not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | muthukrishna | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 16 | view |
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not they would like to accept it, the gover...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, at least, no doubt, talking about, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 317.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06309148265 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93469019666 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602523659306 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1421978989 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3125 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124482387028 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359177232412 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277210326016 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677748268491 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268499017887 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.