Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
We have often heard the famous saying, “Science is necessary evil”. There must have been some reason to coin this term. There have been several instances in which scientific research and development have aided to both constructive and destructive outcomes. Even, though most of the scientific research aids in betterment of everyday life, but there needs to be a few restrictions which should prevent the misuse of scientific development as well.
Today, research in biological and nuclear fields are highly controversial. In field of biological research, there are several strides of development which help in curing deadly diseases and moreover help people protect themselves from deadly outbreak. However, there also lies a dark side to this. Several private organisations might aid in creating biological weapons of mass destruction, which aids in culturing deadly viruses which accelerate mass killing of people silently. Apart, from that, in the field of Nuclear research, there lies both possibilities. Nuclear energy is slowly becoming a popular form for producing huge amount of electrical energy for powering large cities. But nonetheless, some private organisations are also misusing nuclear research to weaponise nuclear weapons, which have the ability to destroy an entire city in seconds. This is evident from the Hiroshima and Nagasaki incident. Thus, there is a necessity for the establishment of certain regulations which prevent scientific research and development that abets in mass destruction.
Another example, in which the regulation on scientific research and development became mandatory was cloning. It was in the late 1970s and 1980s when scientists were able to produce the first clone of sheep, Dolly. However, restrictions had to be put on the scientific research and development, because of the possibility of using it to clones to human beings. If, this restriction wouldn’t have been put in place, then it could have serious consequences like impersonation in crime. Thus, even though it might seem discouragement for scientists, however, this was essential to maintain an order in society.
While, it is evident there needs to be some restrictions, however, it should not be so strict that it aids important research and development. For example, if research on human DNA is prohibited due to possibilities of cloning, then there won’t be important inventions such as stem cell therapy, which are very effective treatment for certain terminal diseases.
Thus, Scientific Research and Development has both boon and bane. No matter, how helpful they help in improving our everyday life, we can nevertheless undermine the possibility of it being misused. Therefore, for these grim chances of being misused, certain restrictions are necessary to be put on the research and development.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233663366337 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.152475247525 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.112871287129 0.0880659088768 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0554455445545 0.0497285424764 111% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0257425742574 0.0444667217837 58% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108910891089 0.12292977631 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0455445544554 0.0406280797675 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.08079085543 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0277227722772 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0693069306931 0.0997080785238 70% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0138613861386 0.0249443105267 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0257425742574 0.0148568991511 173% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2843.0 2732.02544248 104% => OK
No of words: 435.0 452.878318584 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.53563218391 6.0361032391 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.413793103448 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.344827586207 0.280924506359 123% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.264367816092 0.200843997647 132% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.181609195402 0.132149295362 137% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08079085543 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510344827586 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 57.8552629727 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9130434783 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7586814518 59.4972553346 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.608695652 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9130434783 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.739130434783 0.674092028746 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 53.395802099 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.66101694915 1.64882698954 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345928788959 0.391690518653 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0958143893182 0.123202303941 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0663815753018 0.077325440228 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.4812710422 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13259727766 0.149214159877 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132386994571 0.161403998019 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737244016961 0.0892212321368 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.298078031335 0.385218514788 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0672463932139 0.0692045440612 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232865576349 0.275328986314 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603956943714 0.0653680567796 92% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 3.66592920354 246% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.