Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Different people tend to have different opinions about applying restriction on scientific research, some people believe science should not be regulate because it will damage “academic freedom” and will eventually inhibit innovation. However, according to my opinion, science should at least have some regulation due to the following reason:
Firstly, for the researches that have ethical issue, such as animal experiment and medication test, applying a restriction can minimize their abusive and unnecessary harm. By applying ethical standard, government can have the power to prohibit harmful study, and it force researcher to improve their experiment, make it less harmful to the participants. However, if there is not regulation experimenter will only consider their own convenience and ignore the feeling of participants, take Sandford prison experiment for example, before ethical standard of search are fully developed, lot of notorious experiment like Sandford prison experiment does not consider participants’ mental and physical health during the study, which make Many participants not only suffer irreversible damage when they take part in the experiment, they are also lack basic right such as right quit, ask question and know any information about study. This problem did not solve until government develop ethical standard for the research.
Secondly, government’s restriction can also guarantee public and researcher’s safety, this is because certain area, like biotechnology and chemistry can be significantly risky, if government do not tell researcher which direction they should focus, these most advance knowledge might be abused. Take nuclear physics as an example, nuclear is an extremely potential and dangerous subject that can both use to create valuable energy and dangerous weapons, if researchers use it to create nuclear bomb it can kills millions of people. However, thanks to the regulation among the world, nuclear physic is only use to create energy, which prevent a huge disaster.
Although it is necessary for government to impose restrictions on scientific research, excessive restrictions are still bad for the science, this is because too much regulation can slow down the scientific progress and innovation. The reason behind this is the develop of the science require study from diverse direction, and excessive regulation on the other hand will make scientific research only focus on few directions, which is bad for the science. Take my major psychology for example, psychology is a study of human behavior, which can influence by many factors, such as culture, physical condition, childhood experience and mental health. So in order to fully understand human’s behavior, scientist must have compressive understand on sociology, biology, and many other subject, and if certain subject is restricted by government, they are unable to fully understand psychology and develop advance theory.
Generally speaking, it is good for government to apply some restriction on scientific research and development because it can minimal the harm and dangerous, However, too much restriction might hinder the develop of the science because it eliminates diversity in scientific research.
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 55
- I extremely agree with the point that Paul explained about air pollution In my opinion one major environmental problem is global warming This is caused by people burning fossil fuels for warmth and electricity that will create greenhouse gases but it can
- Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these 75
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... regulation due to the following reason: Firstly, for the researches that have et...
^^^^
Line 2, column 841, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lacked'.
Suggestion: lacked
...e part in the experiment, they are also lack basic right such as right quit, ask que...
^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'kill'.
Suggestion: kill
...rs use it to create nuclear bomb it can kills millions of people. However, thanks to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, at least, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 42.0 12.9106741573 325% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2754.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 483.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70186335404 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99745057541 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501035196687 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 856.8 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 23.0359550562 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.472925043 60.3974514979 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 211.846153846 118.986275619 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1538461538 23.4991977007 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 5.21951772744 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207507217965 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882888322743 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522039259713 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126350793206 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488650699936 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.0 14.1392134831 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.0 48.8420337079 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 12.1743820225 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.1639044944 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.2143820225 150% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.