The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the statement, it is being asserted that the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. however, I found this argument is an over-generalization and it is tenuous in several aspects.
there is no deny that some of the greatness of individuals are recognized and acknowledged by the descendants. For example, Copernicus, one of the greatest scientist throughout the history, had defied the orthodoxy geocentric theory at his time and suggested heliocentric theory which states that sun is the centre of the universe instead of planet earth. His theory was rejected by majority of the people at that time because many of the religious factors were hindering people to accept ideas that contradicts what their belief is advocating. And unfortunately, the geocentric theory was proved credential after a long time of his death.
however, it is unfair to claim that one’s glory cannot be decided by their contemporaries with hundred percent certainty. In the field of physiology, an example could be Youyou Tu. By cooperating extremely well with her team, she had successfully discovered the way to treat malaria, which her invention has saved and is continue to save millions of life. this huge contribution to human development was appreciated by people in the contemporary society and she was awarded with the Noble prize in the category of physiology. Madam Curie, one the most well-known scientists, dedicated almost nine years the refinement of radium. Her perseverance was highly praised by the people at her time but also created a positive model for the younger generations. As a form of acknowledgement from her contemporaries for her great achievement, she was the laureate of the Nobel prize in the science field. Nowadays, there are a number of award that is design to identify the outstanding creation in modern society and to thank those illumines’ devotion of their time and energy to make human society greater.
In sum, in the past, one’s greatness might be impeded by various factors to be recognized by the people at the same time period, whereas now, individuals who has made great contribution will definitely receive attentions and appreciations from contemporaries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | stevewang1007 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | IFE360TOXIC | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Zhang Ergou | 70 | view |
- claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate 68
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 50
- Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image. 66
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have c 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...fter them, not by their contemporaries. however, I found this argument is an over-gener...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...uous in several aspects. there is no deny that some of the greatness o...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 23, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s. there is no deny that some of the greatness of individuals are recognized...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duals are recognized and acknowledged by the decedents. For example, Copernicus, ...
^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... long time of his death. however, it is unfair to claim that one's ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 101, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...be decided by their contemporaries with hundred percent certainty. In the field of phys...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 327, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'continued'.
Suggestion: continued
...a, which her invention has saved and is continue to save millions of life. this huge con...
^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d is continue to save millions of life. this huge contribution to human development ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47107438017 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21451838217 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9613569295 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.857142857 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187899158609 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698021297318 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105001757196 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140767262199 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950043599409 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.