If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The ethical issue of if a worthy goal can justify for any means taken to achieve it, regardless of how bad they are, has been a controversial one. Many people argue that the means are not important, as long as an honorable end is reached. Others disagree, contending that the means are as important as the goals, and everything you do needs to follow a moral code. Personally, I concur with the latter opinion due to the following reasons and examples.
First, the law is created to define the ethical limit of an action and it is obvious that everyone must follow the law. One of the situations that is the most controversial is in the war. In World War II, the Allies ordered air bombing into civilian areas, with the reasons that this would devastate the spirit of Germany and Japan, and force them to surrender, thus shorted the war. This action violated the law of war that said to only target military locations, or economical important spots. Many civilians were denied the right of freedom of choice, as the Allies chose the death for them. The peak of horror was when the America dropped 2 nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki city. Hundreds of thousands died in a blink of an eye, and to this day there are still thousands of people die every day due to the sequela of the bombings. I doubt that not many soldiers and general can come to term with themselves and sleep well when they know about the horrible effect of the bombs.
Second, there are many cases that the means are better than the goals. As an old saying “the journey is better than the destination”, sometimes the experience that we get along the way are more important than the results, and it is still important even if we do not attain the goal. Success achieved by cutting corners is volatile and vulnerable, and it can go away at any moment. For example, there are students who cheat to get good grade. Although good grade can bring them better opportunities after graduation, it can only bring them this far. A high-grade student but without knowledge is no way better than a low-grade student but actually tried to learn and eventually imbibe the knowledge. You can also learn more in failure and struggle, as I understand it fully through learning programming. Nowadays, there are many tools and code libraries that are readily available to make the engineering tasks much easier, but by doing everything from scratch, you can learn a lot, even if you cannot make the thing work.
In conclusion, the claim is only true to some extent, as we, humans, need to hold our actions to a certain ethical and moral standard, and sometimes the experience we get from achieving or not achieving the goal is more valuable than the goal itself.
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 75
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to program', 'to programme'.
Suggestion: to program; to programme
... I understand it fully through learning programming. Nowadays, there are many tools and cod...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, so, still, thus, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2244.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65560165975 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51929760431 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53112033195 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5350749061 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9523809524 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127807752897 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345029346815 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382129211224 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823419809003 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588551528033 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.