There are times when an individual becomes more known by later generation than by current. For example, Jane Austen’s novels became famous after her death. However That does not mean that an individual is more highly celebrated by later generations than by their contemporaries.
An individual who lived in the 80s would have a significantly different lifestyle and cultural view than one who lives in the current generation. In the 80’s, people were more conservative and had a very parochial view on life when it came to women’s behaviour in society, gender views, etc. A man considered great in the 80’s would be one who smokes and drinks, focuses on career over household duties, and is the breadwinner of the household. That person would not be favoured in today’s society wherein majority of the men are considered equally responsible for household chores and would consider themselves an equal to a woman, not superior. Take the case of the men from the Friends TV. Fans in the 90’s viewed them as the ‘standard’ to have as partners, however, majority of people from the current generation are pointing out the flaws of Joey, Ross and Chandler that would not be tolerated today.
Take Shakespeare as another example. Shakespearan plays were the prime of that generation. Although it true that our generation appreciates how Shakespeare created new English words, his plays would not be as celebrated today as they were back then since we would not be able to connect with the language spoken. Only esoteric Shakespearean enthusiasts would be able to connect to such plays being put on today.
In addition, a person’s good qualities may be exaggerated by their contemporaries who see their favorite individual through rose-coloured glasses. It is only people in the later generations who can differentiate the good qualities from the bad as they view the person through a logical lens. For example, Mother Theresa was quite popular during her time but they failed to see that Mother Theresa tried to convert all those she healed into Christianity.
Although, there are cases wherein an individual is unappreciated in their own time especially if they have views different from the majority. For example, an artist who is an ally of the LGBTQ community would not be abel to beome successful in the older generations who were not LGBTQ friendly. However, they would not face any such difficulties today.
Nonetheless, a person is considered greater to contemporaries since they all share similar contexts and lifetyles and hence can relate to each other’s lifestyles.
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 70
- Issue 41 The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Task Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the p 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s novels became famous after her death. However That does not mean that an individual i...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erations than by their contemporaries. An individual who lived in the 80s would...
^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...e prime of that generation. Although it true that our generation appreciates how Sha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2184.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16312056738 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94364880162 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522458628842 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6838870235 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146250460917 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444799674712 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344885869523 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744689209362 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243497966777 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.