In the contemporary world, people don’t have to worry about safety from an animal attack or bad weather. A person living a luxurious life is more secured with resources available at hand in tough times. However, that does not mean that a person who lives a luxurious life of comfort can still become independent and strong.
An individual who has enough resources to satisfy their basic needs and not have to worry about day-to-day expenses can still face obstacles that develop them into a more resilient person. Let’s take a woman who has all the conveniences of contemporary life and the monetary backing such she does not have worry about day-to-day expenditures. However, this woman might have a mentally disabled son such that despite having all the reources and material comforts, she has no freedom to do what she wants. This child would be dependant on her physically and emotionally. Another individual, who has amazing family support and the independence to do what she wants, is physically disabled and unable to walk. She would have to grow as person and accept her disability and move through life with resilience.
Even if we don’t look at such extreme examples, a person who has no disabilities could still be facing the pressures that come with living in this contemporary world. These days the world has become so competitive that you have to aim to always be the best. Even mediocrity is looked down upon and wanting to live a peaceful life where a person wishes to be home by 5 and enjoy home life more is laughed at. In this day and age, you always have grind your way up and be the best in order to be respected and to earn a livable wage.
According to recent research articles, loneliness is also an increasing factor because people are living more individualistic lifestyles as opposed to the older ages which emphasized community and family. This again is a hardship that does require people to develop strengths.
Of course, living in this contemporary life, people do have access to more resources and more freedom of choice than they did before. Individuals nowadays, especially those dwelling in urban areas, don’t have to worry about fulfilling their basic needs. Nonetheless, just living a life of comforts and luxuries does not remove the problems that is inherent in human’s lives such as disabilities, pressures, etc.
- Issue 41 The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Task Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the p 75
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 70
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
... do what she wants. This child would be dependant on her physically and emotionally. Anot...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'grind'.
Suggestion: have always grind
...is laughed at. In this day and age, you always have grind your way up and be the best in order to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'ground'.
Suggestion: ground
...t. In this day and age, you always have grind your way up and be the best in order to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, still, well, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72458859627 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531328320802 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6216135017 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18666751782 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610735257569 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489010446947 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113232199844 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625190822039 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
... do what she wants. This child would be dependant on her physically and emotionally. Anot...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'grind'.
Suggestion: have always grind
...is laughed at. In this day and age, you always have grind your way up and be the best in order to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'ground'.
Suggestion: ground
...t. In this day and age, you always have grind your way up and be the best in order to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, still, well, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72458859627 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531328320802 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6216135017 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18666751782 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610735257569 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489010446947 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113232199844 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625190822039 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.