Issue topic: Governments are justified in circumventing civil laws when doing so is vital to the protection of national security.
In Stone Age humans struggled to fulfill their basic needs of food, water and shelter all the while facing challenges thrown at them by Mother Nature. Since then, humans have come far. They developed civilizations notably the Greek Civilization which set the foundations of democracy. Not quite four centuries ago, the American Revolution led to successful formation of a government elected by the people for the people, which cemented some of the basic rights for all its citizens.
While a large portion of the world's population still struggles to have two square meals a day, the other portion is engaged in facing challenges not lesser in severity than the Neanderthals did ten thousand years ago. Through countless civil rights movements across the world, some of the basic rights of citizens of an increasingly global society such as the right to privacy, the right of free speech have been defined. But are all these laws worth the cost of destabilizing entire nations?
As the society continues to strive for a better life by utilizing the advents in technology, the nefarious elements of society make use of the same technology for their own criminal activities which threaten the tranquility of society. At such times if Governments step in and put a curb on some civil rights to ensure the safety and balance of its citizens, the restriction of some freedoms is a price worth paying.
In light of the recent Coronavirus epidemic in countries like China, South Korea and Italy; if the restriction on freedom of movement of people ensures that the disease does not spread further then is it immoral to place curfews in affected areas?
In many countries religious radicalism and extremism are giving rise to terrorism. In such cases if the Government puts a curb on freedom of speech by detaining individuals representing certain organizations who call for armed revolts, is it dictatorial? Bomb blasts caused by such organizations have killed thousands over the years, all over the world. A bullet or a bomb doesn't ask the race or religion of its victims.
Many individuals with their own warped sense of moral and/or racial superiority have been responsible for mass shootings. Many disturbed minds have done the same. Many individuals embezzle money which is then used to finance criminal activities. If getting bank-records of such people circumventing the usual lengthy procedure of getting a warrant, then it is worth skirting the civil rights of these people who are not worthy of them.
Internet, arguably the most important invention of the twenty-first century ushered in an era driven by information. It is possible to write reports on obscure topics like 'Variety of Rice Found in Senegal' by just typing in some words in a search engine. But criminal elements have gone on to steal hard-earned money of thousands by using Internet. Online trolling, stalking, leaking of private materials have caused thousands of lives to be ruined. In such cases if Internet usage is monitored by governments to put a stop to online black markets selling firearms, illegal drugs, child pornography; I am hard-pressed to call it tyranny.
If someone types b**bs in a search engine, why should the government care? They should not care if some adolescent teen is replacing the asterisks with the letters 'o', 'o'. But they should care if a misguided youth is replacing those same asterisks with the letters 'o' and 'm'. Because one should not use his civil rights to seize those same rights from others and if an elected government is circumventing the laws that give these rights to ensure safety of large populace, it is the right way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-04 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | Swarnali Swarno | 50 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | Swarnali Swarno | 75 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | srilakshmip05 | 33 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | ojehparvaz | 58 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e people for the people, which cemented some of the basic rights for all its citizens. W...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the basic rights for all its citizens. While a large portion of the worlds popu...
^^^
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...tizens. While a large portion of the worlds population still struggles to have two ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ivil rights movements across the world, some of the basic rights of citizens of an increasi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...hat the disease does not spread further then is it immoral to place curfews in affec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...extremism are giving rise to terrorism. In such cases if the Government puts a cur...
^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... all over the world. A bullet or a bomb doesnt ask the race or religion of its victims...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sk the race or religion of its victims. Many individuals with their own warped s...
^^^
Line 6, column 164, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...any disturbed minds have done the same. Many individuals embezzle money which is the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3034.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 605.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01487603306 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95951083803 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78513132402 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525619834711 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 951.3 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9636154954 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.37037037 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4074074074 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.74074074074 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0869746534164 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222910382129 0.0831039109588 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323113102884 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0369779233703 0.150359130593 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207027228286 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e people for the people, which cemented some of the basic rights for all its citizens. W...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the basic rights for all its citizens. While a large portion of the worlds popu...
^^^
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...tizens. While a large portion of the worlds population still struggles to have two ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ivil rights movements across the world, some of the basic rights of citizens of an increasi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...hat the disease does not spread further then is it immoral to place curfews in affec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...extremism are giving rise to terrorism. In such cases if the Government puts a cur...
^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... all over the world. A bullet or a bomb doesnt ask the race or religion of its victims...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sk the race or religion of its victims. Many individuals with their own warped s...
^^^
Line 6, column 164, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...any disturbed minds have done the same. Many individuals embezzle money which is the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3034.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 605.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01487603306 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95951083803 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78513132402 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525619834711 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 951.3 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9636154954 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.37037037 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4074074074 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.74074074074 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0869746534164 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222910382129 0.0831039109588 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323113102884 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0369779233703 0.150359130593 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207027228286 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.