Living in nowadays interconnected human society, it is hard to just construe a person as a single unit regardless of his or her role in any form of society. Thus, I agree with the statement saying that we primarily define ourselves through social groups.
Since we were born, we have been considered as parents’ children, someone’s brothers or sisters, says, we are deeply mounted into a net connecting with parents and relatives, and what we have done are all related to gain the recognition from other members. For example, we are said to be great sons and daughters, we are hoped to become great peers, we are supposed to put piety as a priority, all these things are what we have been trying to achieve to build the identification with the family.
After we have become adults and started to work for corporates, we started to build our own families, we are all suffered from the roles the society hopes we can be. For instance, we should do great parenting, we should be productive employees or ambitious executives; the list can go on and on, and human usually let these things define us, mostly it is because of that if we reach these goals, we are right fitted into the society, and human is a social creature, we always think that being in a social group is the only thing that matters.
However, some might contend that it is also crucial for us to find our own identities, says, we have different personalities, we have different habits, we have different preferences of tastes, …… All indicates that we are all different, we should not let the society to define what we are. Though it sounds convincing, the thing which we should acknowledge is that while we are all different, we still live together in society, no matter it is a family or a larger social group. Others’ opinions shape what we are, and it is the thing that builds the complex human society, says, in order to become a member of human society, we still need to get recognition from others, which means, let society define ourselves.
All in all, though it is also important to scrutinize a person inside-out to find his or her own identity, I believe it is that we primarily find our identification within any format of social groups.
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 79
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 66
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and Development 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 83
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities 70
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
Living in nowadays interconnected human society, it is har...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69974554707 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68609745803 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483460559796 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 6.24550561798 320% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 23.0359550562 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5265053521 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 184.7 118.986275619 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.3 23.4991977007 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36791050728 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174840354474 0.0831039109588 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114368175761 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214583521179 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295973439299 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 14.1392134831 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 11.2143820225 157% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
Living in nowadays interconnected human society, it is har...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69974554707 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68609745803 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483460559796 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 6.24550561798 320% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 23.0359550562 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5265053521 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 184.7 118.986275619 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.3 23.4991977007 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36791050728 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174840354474 0.0831039109588 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114368175761 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214583521179 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295973439299 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 14.1392134831 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 11.2143820225 157% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.