Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Many would maintain that laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places for many reasons. Yet, I still believe law should remain immutable and stringent. I am going to enumerate reasons to bolster my dogma.
Of course, when people are judged by law, not all people confront and encounter exact situations; it is rather complicated and various incidences. Existence of law is for protect the poor and pursue social justice; due to this reason, the law needs to take account of various factors when judges make decisions. For example, if a miscreant committed a crime from his or her poverty, the judgement on the person should be based on more flexibility than a random firm which has a responsibility for worsening consumers' health for their profit. In terms of consideration for incidences that people do not have a choice than committing a crime, laws should not be strict and be more generous with deliberation of various circumstances, times, and places.
Despite of protection for the marginalized citizens by laws, based on the primacy definition of law, it should treat all people same with equal stance. Laws should be remained impartial and unbiased regardless of any situations, even which can evoke sympathy. Once laws consider all circumstances whether it is a good purpose or not, it breaks the most crucial attribute of law - unfairness, and it is going to engender skeptics for citizens. Back to the poverty crime example, if the miscreant punished lightly, it can cause tremendous confusion and ambiguity for the rest of people. For example, when other people steal foods because they are poor too but richer than the examplifed miscreant, dilemma kicks in and people will start to be confounded. In order to thwart equivocal dilemma and injustices, law should not be flexible and remains static.
However, if laws sentence people too harshly, it will also bring incongrous opinions for people. In order to ameorliate strictness of law, society and governments can make up systems and programs to atone sympathateic crimes such as introducing jobs for the poor once they are done with the sentence. Once well and delicated system are formed, it can bring out positive outcome to society while laws remains calm and fair.
To sum up, notwithstanding the all miserable circumstances, times, and places which can be used as excuses for one's crime, laws should not be flexible; otherwise, it will start to cause frustration and discomfit. Rather, ratifying well-structured programs and system which can prevent and compensate miserable factors are going to be ancillary for a better society and allow laws to remain fair.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve 70
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 83
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries 54
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...hich has a responsibility for worsening consumers health for their profit. In terms of co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...places which can be used as excuses for ones crime, laws should not be flexible; oth...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, for example, of course, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1533180778 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87929506442 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6937534888 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.111111111 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2777777778 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326803565435 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114409770021 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106740232419 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207775173812 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110429283325 0.0667264976115 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...hich has a responsibility for worsening consumers health for their profit. In terms of co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...places which can be used as excuses for ones crime, laws should not be flexible; oth...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, for example, of course, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1533180778 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87929506442 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6937534888 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.111111111 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2777777778 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326803565435 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114409770021 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106740232419 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207775173812 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110429283325 0.0667264976115 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.