Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is known that leadership is a crucial aspect of human’s lives. It can be present everyday and in every moment we could imagine. Leaders are not only the politicians, that are usually chosen by vote, but also anyone who stands into a position that represents other interests or into a prominent position. I agree with the given statement that leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them because the requests we put on someone may shape their positions and behavior.
As stated before a could be anyone that represents others concerns and speaks and works in favor of them. When a leader, that could be for example a politician, a class’representant or a professor, is facing a lot of opposition it is expected that some change occurs. For example, when the community’s leader of my neighborhood was not able to represent well the community requests into the city hall, the community made a assembly to choose a new leader. Furthermore, this new leader chosen was a young guy with no experience but who was modeled by the requests and demands that our community put on him. Over time, this new leader show to be a great leader, because he was a common person who knew all the expectations that our community had and he tried hardly to fulfill all of them.
Moreover, when leaders are facing a lot of supporting position in general, it is probable that they continue doing what they are doing. In order to please their subordinates. The fact is that also models the leader position and behavior. Indeed, showing that our requirements and requests create or modeling our leaders. For instance, when a politician is performing a good government favoring the people, we will see that citizen’s request will be that the government program and actions continue like that for a long time, in order to maintain the stability of the economy and other important aspects, such as social and educational.
However, if the leader is dictatorial or authoritarian this will probably not happen. And this is the only case that the given statement may not be true. Since and authoritarian leader is not created by the request or demand that are placed on them. On the other hand, they are created by their own nefarious beliefs and requests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ect of human’s lives. It can be present everyday and in every moment we could imagine. L...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... into the city hall, the community made a assembly to choose a new leader. Furthe...
^
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'tried'.
Suggestion: hardly tried
...ectations that our community had and he tried hardly to fulfill all of them. Moreover, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83979328165 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82526207213 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480620155039 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4860516329 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.055555556 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157828250774 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556134789045 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589196175504 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108639997752 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300526249344 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.