Men and women due to their inherent physical differences are not suitable for many tasks

Essay topics:

Men and women due to their inherent physical differences are not suitable for many tasks

During the 20th century, women were always considered as secondary and weak due to the inherent physical differences and were not suited to perform many tasks. The women are equally capable and can be easily compared with men in every prospect of life in this generation. The prompt recommends that men and women have inherent physical differences which eschew them to perform task which might not be their cup of tea. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the prompt of the essay for two reasons.

Men and women both lately have been seen in the professions which were uncommon in the orthodox and traditional 20th century. For instance, Men's were always recommended to work in a multinational company or were suggested to run a country but now men are also seen into the chef's profession which had always been predominated by women and also women are seen to run a nation by becoming the president of the nation which was considered as a men's profession. The above example illustrates that though men and women have physical inherent differences but that does not stop them in persuing a professional carrier of their interest.

Additionally, Men were considered as the head of the family and all the financial problems needs to be resolved solely by men and women's were considered to play a vital role in upbringing of their child and manage all the household jobs in daily basis. However, in this advanced generation men and women are treated equally and both play a significant role in determinig child's upbringing as well as financial investments. Thus the above example supports the idea of trusting men and women to be equally skilled in managing all the prospects of life.

Off course, some people may argue and support the author that the inherent physical differences makes men and women not equally suited for many task. However, one cannot make a judgement based on one sided unwarranted assumptions and consider all the points before making a vital decision. People who ignores their inner voices do so at their own peril.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-07-09 devansh 50 view
2016-09-02 Aummul 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user devansh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'chefs'' or 'chef's'?
Suggestion: chefs'; chef's
...ntry but now men are also seen into the chefs profession which had always been predom...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...nt role in determinig childs upbringing as well as financial investments. Thus the above e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nging as well as financial investments. Thus the above example supports the idea of ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun task seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tasks'.
Suggestion: many tasks
...es men and women not equally suited for many task. However, one cannot make a judgement b...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, for instance, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92485549133 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68445305704 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3470214766 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.076923077 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6153846154 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410066735021 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150877975283 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113344267505 0.0758088955206 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258096514861 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894492075922 0.0667264976115 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.