'Moderation in all things' is ill-considered advice. Rather, one should say, 'Moderation in most
things,' since many areas of human concern require or at least profit from intense focus
I agree moderation in all things is ill-considered advice. Innovation of anything requires a depth study of that subject and moderation can't bring depth approach rather it gives a holistic approach. Reaping maximum profits out of any area require intense focus and moderation approach can't provide it. Also, in this interlinked world, mere expertise in one area can't be parameter for success. Information of other areas are also required. Thus moderation in most areas of human concern and expertise in one area is an acceptable verdict.
Moderation can't give the depth knowledge of any area of human concern and without going to the depth one cannot understand the complexity and intricacies related to that area. Without understanding the complexity, one cannot understand that prevalent problems of that area. Without understanding the prevalent limitations or problems of that area, one cannot bring the innovation and thus can't provide the profit in that area of concern. The best example is Steve Jobs who defied the moderation approach to his area of bringing innovation in Personal computer industry. Leaving a college to pursue his dream of revolutionising personal computer industry can't be said a moderate approach. Taking this bold decisions provided him that intense focus to work on his dream and bring a change in personal computer industry which need no further explanation. It is evident that he left his college because he was not able to give his all efforts on his dream and if he would have continued studying there then may be we would be deprived of his masterclass creation which he told later himself. This is not a single example which bolster the fact that moderation in all things can't bring the commensurate profits. Bill Gates is another same example which lend more support to my point. He was also a college drop-out who wanted to create an operating system and his creation's impact need no introduction.
However, It is not possible to give equally intense focus on every area of human concern but knowledge in other areas are equally important. One area demands the knowledge of other areas, may be not of that expert level. The example of Steve jobs' calligraphy knowledge for creation of fonts explain this. He was not an expert of this field but it helped him in making fonts for his text editor software. He was moderate of this field which eventually helped him in his business. Similarly if you are a techie who wants to do a start-up of semiconductor industry, then moderation in knowledge of semiconductor field may not provide the profit in this field. You have to be an expert of this field. However, moderation in finance field or management field can be fruitful.
Thus moderation in all things is bit extreme remark and it is rightly pointed that intense focus will not be possible and subsequently profits will not come. Nevertheless, it is not possible to have expert level knowledge in all fields thus moderation in most other field can produce desired result, also proven in past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-07-31 | ujjwalkrpl | 45 | view |
| 2016-07-31 | ujjwalkrpl | 50 | view |
- The material progress and well-being of one country are necessarily connected to thematerial progress and well-being of all other countries 50
- "We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whoseviews contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning." 16
- 'Moderation in all things' is ill-considered advice. Rather, one should say, 'Moderation in mostthings,' since many areas of human concern require or at least profit from intense focus' 45
- 'Moderation in all things' is ill-considered advice. Rather, one should say, 'Moderation in mostthings,' since many areas of human concern require or at least profit from intense focus 50
- Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a newenvironment and--, eventually, --to change it 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...th study of that subject and moderation cant bring depth approach rather it gives a ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e intense focus and moderation approach cant provide it. Also, in this interlinked w...
^^^^
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...inked world, mere expertise in one area cant be parameter for success. Information o...
^^^^
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ation of other areas are also required. Thus moderation in most areas of human conce...
^^^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...is an acceptable verdict. Moderation cant give the depth knowledge of any area of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ne cannot bring the innovation and thus cant provide the profit in that area of conc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...olutionising personal computer industry cant be said a moderate approach. Taking thi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 963, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had continued'?
Suggestion: had continued
... his all efforts on his dream and if he would have continued studying there then may be we would be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1004, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...ould have continued studying there then may be we would be deprived of his masterclass...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1171, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... the fact that moderation in all things cant bring the commensurate profits. Bill Ga...
^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... eventually helped him in his business. Similarly if you are a techie who wants to do a s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...r management field can be fruitful. Thus moderation in all things is bit extreme...
^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
...l. Thus moderation in all things is bit extreme remark and it is rightly pointe...
^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...can produce desired result, also proven in past.
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.28021978022 0.240241500013 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.14652014652 0.157235817809 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0842490842491 0.0880659088768 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0549450549451 0.0497285424764 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0604395604396 0.0444667217837 136% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.113553113553 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0311355311355 0.0406280797675 77% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77336351598 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021978021978 0.030933414821 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0952380952381 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.021978021978 0.0249443105267 88% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014652014652 0.0148568991511 99% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3039.0 2732.02544248 111% => OK
No of words: 507.0 452.878318584 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99408284024 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358974358974 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287968441815 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.195266272189 0.200843997647 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12426035503 0.132149295362 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77336351598 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41617357002 0.48968727796 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.2987312928 55.4138127331 85% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5 23.380412469 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1246221581 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.884615385 141.124799967 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.380412469 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.384615384615 0.674092028746 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.21349557522 269% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 48.2968441815 51.4728631049 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.62237762238 1.64882698954 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226196033688 0.391690518653 58% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.202052288842 0.123202303941 164% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.143868376661 0.077325440228 186% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.472300344645 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130271898003 0.149214159877 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946957826864 0.161403998019 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073783745943 0.0892212321368 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.341576915611 0.385218514788 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0532046787161 0.0692045440612 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18592980161 0.275328986314 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641046360217 0.0653680567796 98% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.