I mostly agree with the statement that analyzing the trend of youths is the most effective way to understand the contemporary culture. Although others may argue that other members in the society is as important as the youths when it comes to shaping the contemporary culture, the youths are the more active and vigorous ones who contribute to identifying the contemporary culture. Since the youths are more active on shaping the contemporary culture, while the contributions of others can't be neglected, I mostly agree with the statement.
One of the best ways to understand the culture is to analyze, knowing the people who represents the culture. Reading researches of the origin or learning the history may give ones a brief overview of a culture, but the better way of understanding a culture is to analyze the population that represents the culture. For example, learning the history of Japan colonizing Taiwan from history classes in school gave me a vague picture of the colonized culture at that time, but the truly knowing of the culture was taught by my grandfather who lived in the society at that time. And by talking to my grandfather I realized that colonization impacted the culture in Taiwan, and the way the generations lived.
The population that represented contemporary culture most is the youths, since they were highly active on shaping the culture. The youths are more creative and fearless, so they often come up with something that no one had imagined before. And those things they created have a higher chance to become part of the contemporary culture. The youths are not afraid of wasting their time on building or creating something useless; for example, internet memes, which are funny pictures that are ridiculous, were nothing useful when it were first invented, but become part of the culture of the contemporary culture. Since they are not afraid of making things that are useless, they create way more things than others in the society. Consequently, with a higher number of creation, the youths have a higher chance to contribute to contemporary culture.
Nonetheless, some may refute that other members of the society also contributes to the contemporary culture, which makes them worth to be analyzed for understanding the contemporary culture. Indeed they do contribute to the contemporary culture, and they do represent that part of the culture. However, the proportion that represents the culture which they are not the youths are significantly less than the youths. Consider the possibility of the things created become part of contemporary culture is fixed, since the things created by the youths are much more than the others, the things that eventually became part of contemporary culture are majorly created by the youth. So the best way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the youths and look at other aspects that are possible the shape the culture.
To sum up, since the best way of understanding a culture is to analyze the people who represent the culture and the people who represent contemporary culture is the youths, I mostly agree with the statement. And not overlooking the other aspects that shaped the culture, such as other members that shaped the culture, gives ones thorough understanding of the culture.
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian a company that manufactures men s clothing Five years ago at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric we discontinued production of our 58
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away t 60
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away t 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 486, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ture, while the contributions of others cant be neglected, I mostly agree with the s...
^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...understanding the contemporary culture. Indeed they do contribute to the contemporary ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, while, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2754.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11895910781 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85580263398 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.355018587361 0.4932671777 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 891.9 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4191605651 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.7 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36449624956 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146992431348 0.0831039109588 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129369927389 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239224004608 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682930870629 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.