Most of the Money devoted to basic scientific research should instead be diverted to applied scientific research
Applied scientific research is to find a solution to a practical problem whereas basic scientific research is to find more theories which help us to understand more about the area of research. I partially agree with this claim in which as the most of the applied scientific research is from the basic scientific research which they have been proved. Let us take an example in machine learning in which the theory is of basic scientific research and they give approximation predictions to the particular algorithm where as in scientific research they derive the approximate results, test, validation accuracy and the loss of the particular approach. Even more as we get more and more theories about the specific area in future, we can get more employment in order to prove those ideas and more beneficiary our society will be. I am not saying to fully stop the funding to the applied scientific research just saying to give more employment to basic scientific search in which we can gain knowledge and know more about the area and can overcome any problems which they occur.
However, applied scientific research need to have a base in order to proceed for further exploration in a particular area of research. The base for any applied scientific research is of basic scientific research and the exploration will be deepen if and only if basic research and theories are known to the researchers. As of now we get know about the theories on the structure of DNA, treatment process etc. There are some cases in which without nay base strength like basic research we can explore and gain results with applied scientific research. For example, there are some researches in space also in medical in which the basic theories are not applicable but application wise it has been worked out and gained more reputation for past few years.
I would like to conclude this topic that we should devote most of the money to basic research in which we can get applied scientific research more opportunities in future and more researchers in present generation are more practical in nature so that they can get more jobs in applied scientific research. As the present generations are better minded and are more innovative in which they can get more accuracy in the field of research. Also, we can see that for any applied research we need to have some base such as any hunch of theory so that we can move forward. Even though we can also get more and more accuracy with the base theory we can get more results if there is zero knowledge on basic research. Basic research can give more and more hunch of theories and can gather more and more working theories which can be applicable in our life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | Mateo Chen | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-24 | Nithin Reddy | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 514, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...predictions to the particular algorithm where as in scientific research they derive the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 660, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...s of the particular approach. Even more as we get more and more theories about the...
^^
Line 1, column 717, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d more theories about the specific area in future, we can get more employment in order to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78663793103 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61354000771 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.364224137931 0.4932671777 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8886050277 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.066666667 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9333333333 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374952244031 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194367295754 0.0831039109588 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146835257613 0.0758088955206 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313870268996 0.150359130593 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613363048273 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.