As per writer, all students should follow the national curriculam until they move to college for higher studies.
I do not agree with writer, as by keeping such restriction will limit the learning for students and it can seriously hamper the future prospects for students.
In the current times, where we have plethora of content available over internet for the students to learn, irrespective of their nationality, it is unwise to limit them to certain curriculam. By doing so, students from nationality where curriculam is restricted have the chances of lagging behind the students, from other nations where there is no such distiction, when they are in college. Better option to promote uniform learning across the nation can be acheived by providing range of optional curriculam. Also, to encourage students to learn from the open web and share their learning across.
To elaborate my point, consider a student, from a nation following a uniform curriculum, stumble upon a principle which is not included in their syllabus, next day when the same student discuss his findings with fellow student, this will eventually lead other students, without effective and correct explaination, more confused than ever and to satitate their curiosity they will dig deeper into the web till they understand it correctly. This will definitely defy the whole purpose of forcing a uniform curriculum.
One would agrue that by keeping uniform curriculam nation-wide will bridge the gap between private and public institutions.
For instance, private instution, although costly, provided better learning when compared with public schools, as they promote additional learning, in the form of extra curricular activities, along with the predecided curriculam. But, Surely this is not the correct way to promote equal oppurtunities for students. Right way would be to promote the public schools by introducing programs to encourage diversified learnings in public schools and emphasize on extra curricular activities.
In conclusion, by restricting the national curriculam for the students cannot help nation in any way. In fact, it can put nation's student on backfoot when there competetion goes beyond national boundries, which is the case these days, as education is not limited to national boundries anymore.
- The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics 62
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 24
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 29
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means puttingold ideas together in new ways. 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the future prospects for students. In the current times, where we have plet...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...size on extra curricular activities. In conclusion, by restricting the nation...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51540616246 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84159000827 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563025210084 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.5964877227 60.3974514979 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.642857143 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13905595269 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518498224942 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501876424505 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697271236749 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526680102644 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.