A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
In present world there is no equality, everything works on money. Nowadays, there is no value for talented people because everything like government job, college seat are bought by money rather than talent. This partiality is there even in the education system which divides the students based on money rather than merit. So i agree with issue that till students enter to college everyone should study same syllabus which result in unbiased education.
In India there 3 different types of education like state syllabus, central syllabus and international syllabus. State syllabus is the education provided by the state government which is followed in most of the public school. Whereas, central and international education followed in private schools. Usually, every parents want there children to study in good school which gives good education but because of different types of education the fee also varies according to the syllabus. For example state education is cheap which everyone can afford, central and international education is costly where everyone cannot afford only people who are above average level can send there children to private schools. Therefore, such education creates division among the students like student who study in private school thinks that public school or state education is cheap and not efficient. Hence, to avoid this division or partiality among students nation should provide same syllabus to everyone.
Sometimes few students are precocious who has higher maturity compares to other students. If the nation has same curriculum the students with high IQ will always stand in the top which does not mean that the students with low IQ will be not smart or intelligent. Based on the performance of the students the curriculum should be different like the students who has high IQ should make them study complex subjects rather than basic subjects and also students with less IQ should study basic concepts first, when they are well versed they should study complex concept. Therefore, different education based on their talent will be more effective than education based on income.
In conclusion, the nation should follow same curriculum in the education system to maintain the equality among the students. Sometimes different education for different talents will also works good because we are not differentiating students based on income but based on talents hence, there will no inequality question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- 2.People who make decisions based on emotions and justify those with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 33
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education 66
- The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects, 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ts based on money rather than merit. So i agree with issue that till students ent...
^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne can afford, central and international education is costly where everyone canno...
^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'work'
Suggestion: work
...ucation for different talents will also works good because we are not differentiating...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38802083333 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58880757144 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442708333333 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4758548936 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.705882353 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205243244998 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072440195826 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889827116744 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137161944436 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641789066369 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.