A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education is the important and integral factor for any human. From education, student's can learn many things like, how to interact with people? what is an essential need for them? The author cited that, in any nation, all curriculum for study should be same until they enter college. In my perspective, this statement is entirely true. Same national curriculum for any nation will beneficial for that nation.
For developing any country, education among people is the first step. If more people of the country are not able to read and write then, they can't think new and hence, that country will not develop innovative things. As well as, the same national curriculum also give useful for developing country. For instance, if in any country, every state has different curriculum and subjects, one student complete their education by first class and then, he/she want to go in other states(where colleges give better education) for graduation. Hence, that student not comfortable for other student's because other students are studied other subjects that he/she not aware of that subject. Therefore, that student's life at risk and this is harmful for the nation.
Furthermore, in India, different people live with each other, that people's languages are different. In every state, different languages are spoken. For instance, if any government officers transferred to another state, then the whole family of officers needs to transfer in other states. Also, their children school changed. Hence, that child is not comfortable with new subjects and language.
In conclusion, the same study among all of student's from same country is the best idea for any nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- Pie Chart for source of energy 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Subject: “College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.” 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...ings like, how to interact with people? what is an essential need for them? The auth...
^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e not able to read and write then, they cant think new and hence, that country will ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...ucation by first class and then, he/she want to go in other stateswhere colleges giv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 692, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... aware of that subject. Therefore, that students life at risk and this is harmful for th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 267.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25842696629 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55169723994 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543071161049 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4089445642 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280391740639 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942979560517 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146964739425 0.0758088955206 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204728828852 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140484453821 0.0667264976115 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.