In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.
In this issue, the author allegation is that principals of any fields need to change after five years. I conceded with author argument principals need to change. But here is one question, “Why leadership needs to change exactly after five years?” So I believe this argument is to some extent credible. I agree with the statement that new leaders beneficial to their enterprise. However, we should keep in mind that, Experienced leaders role are undeniable.
Firstly, in my perspective, the authors claim about the new leader role in business is acceptable. Because younger leader are most motivated and motivation is best for success in any business. If young leader is enthusiastic, hard working so this will useful as perfect example to work with their colleagues. Moreover, Young leaders are aware of new technologies So they can give new ideas for their enterprise to flourish business. For instance, Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai tenure more and more Google product created and successful in the market.
Secondly, new education leader also helpful. If An old education minister changed by younger person So this decision effect to many aspects. Likewise, younger education minister know, market demand, aware of new technologies. Consequently, they can change subjects, create a competition/event so more students can get a benefit of this.
In Addition, the most effect on government. If in every five years government leader changed so people hope that the new government gives new policy, that will fruitful to them. Here it’s like coins have two sides. Changing leaders is also good decision because leaders current action can give result their tenure. For Example, If a current government make more corruption, bribery as a result of this political leader changed in next election and people faith that next leader is more honest and trustworthy than previous.
In sum, it becomes necessary to change the leadership at regular intervals in order to ensure that the best available talent in the market is tapped for leading an organization on the path to success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | meghanajilla | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-08 | er.vprashant | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 16 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years. 40
- Some People believe that Robots play an important role in future societies While other argue that robots might have negative effects on societies give often 63
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numb 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...e should keep in mind that, Experienced leaders role are undeniable. Firstly, in my ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dly, new education leader also helpful. If An old education minister changed by yo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 334.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29640718563 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86229580581 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2846192261 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.45 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05 5.21951772744 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0804864254441 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027079702007 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052645064491 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0431790673549 0.150359130593 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468347605553 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.