A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Education is the foundation of advancement of human societies, however, academic ideologies are varied from country to country. Some promotes educational liberty in order to inspire students towards their true desires while others consider freedom to choose your learning path is rather a distraction. From my point of view, with the intension to yield proficiency and consistency for quality control, a nation should consider having a same national curriculum for all states institutes. Also, it caters all students with equal playing field for healthier national competition. As any other policy, trying to keep a unified system in place could impose some risks on developing countries, where students and educators from less developed region most likely find it tough to keep up with the national standard.
All educational institutes share the same interest to ensure as many students are graduating with high credentials and merits. Thus, quality control has always been a primary concern. For countries with limited resources provided to academic, pursuing a uniformed system could help reduce friction between private and public institution. To better illustrate the scenario, when government authority carries out audit or evaluation on the students’ performance, it would be much simpler to possess the same evaluating scale among different institutes. For instance, most countries conducting a High school National Exam requires all students to follow the same syllabus so that all students share the same playing field with their result be fairly validated.
Due to the high mobility amongst students from different states, a single system secures a smooth transferal for both students and lecturers. If there exist multiple curriculums across schools, it would be less possible for students to adapt to the new teaching approach and material, thus, reduce their chances of success. Same goes for teachers, especially those in low-income countries where shared efforts and resources are required predominantly in fields at high demands such as medical and education. When a teacher is required to teach while learning new methods, low productivity is expected to occur. Thus, government coercion on the educational constructs and content is crucial.
Also, from my point of view, maturity level of students is also a critical element contributing to the success or the failure of this policy. In most Western nations, students are groomed to be independent thinker at very young age, which bestowed them with the cognitive skills to decide what curriculum best suit them. Also, as financial implication is less constricted thanks to government funding and overall economic environment, such freedom is made feasible. Thus, this policy would instead be counterproductive. Respectively, providing the flexibility to have elective courses during high school would better guide them towards the right career paths. On the other hand, in less-developed nations where educational structure is unstable and students are financially and mentally reliant, granting freedom is no difference to introduce complication and confusion.
In summary, the implementation of any policy always has a double-edge. The key to seizure the benefits is to evaluate correctly the current shortcomings of the situation. In other words, if an education system is concrete enough to provide new matrix and freedom, the policy should lean towards promoting flexibility. Otherwise, a standard protocol should be suggested.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Shams Tarek | 62 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | ali.rs | 50 | view |
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 83
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 83
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 70
- Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.Write a response in which you discuss the exte 81
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'curriculum the best'.
Suggestion: curriculum the best
...ith the cognitive skills to decide what curriculum best suit them. Also, as financial implicati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 872, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o introduce complication and confusion. In summary, the implementation of any po...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in summary, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2990.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63088512241 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98311623699 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 215.323595506 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566854990584 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 922.5 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5433154645 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.24 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199362286258 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514841460452 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523366963992 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109567881721 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492707672865 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 179.0 100.480337079 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.