Is there an objectively right answer to that? People usually argue that students should only be taught courses that they like and have an interest in. I, on the other hand, believe that until the student knows what different fields have to offer, he or she should not choose a specific curriculum to follow. The knowledge of different fields like science, mathematics, literature, history etc. through the schooling years make students aware of the different walks of life and help them decide to land on a prospect profession. Even if they have ambivalent ideas about a couple of courses, they will be certain about the subjects that they do not want to pursue. The requirement of a nation to follow a national curriculum could be reflected through the following examples.
For instance, a particular school follows a curriculum, which would a nationwide practice, in which only science mathematics and history are taught. The students will have exposure to only these areas of study and will eventually choose from it as a professional field for his or her college. The student oblivious to other areas like art, literature computers etc does not know that these fields also exist. The unfamiliarity of the aforementioned courses could be a reason that the student is unable to decide on a career choice because he or she does not like any of the subjects he has been taught and is unable to perceive a future in those areas.
However, if the schools offer a wide gamut of courses that encompass the pre requisites for major technological fields like engineering, medicine, information technology, etc. It would enable the pupils to get a diverse knowledge of the subjects and might also help them to choose a field that combines a couple of courses they have interest in and pursue as a profession. Since, the populace is exposed to a variety of knowledge, it bolsters their decision of choosing a profession for their profession and leads them to be excellent at what they do.
To sum up, I would say that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college in order to reinforce their decision of a profession and it also allows them to choose from a disparate set of options.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 38
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 50
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 23
- The following appeared in a memo from the Board of Directors of Butler Manufacturing."During the past year, workers at Butler Manufacturing reported 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are 43
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f life and help them decide to land on a prospect profession. Even if they have a...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... not know that these fields also exist. The unfamiliarity of the aforementioned cou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, for instance, of course, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86945169713 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76367026323 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493472584856 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9888877455 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294936225612 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899950357422 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129155331121 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212811358996 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187447402041 0.0667264976115 281% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.