In this issue, it is stated that all students should be studied the same curriculum before attending the college. Personally speaking, although there might be some crediting figures toward this statement, I disagree with the assertion. In what fallows, I will discuss my disagreement with using reasons and examples.
First, one should take into account this significant fact that this strategy is really a waste of student time. Students can only study what they want or what they really like, and eager to study in colleges. In this way, they will acquire the important knowledge and skill in short time. Furthermore, it can reduce the cost of studying that impose by long years of studying. The noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics revealed by a recent social researcher conducted in our country, show that the amount of budget that each year spending for irrelevant subjects.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that all students do not like all subjects such as mathematics, algebra and so forth. In this hand, if students have to study the same curriculum, they may lose their enthusiastic to continue their subjects at colleges, or even they might drop out. The modern world offers abundant examples of successful people who not continue their studying due to the fact that they suffer from understanding some irrelevant lessons.
Finally, on the other hand, my stance might not be true in all circumstances. By this strategy, student can experience a lot of different subjects, which be made by scientists. So, student can recognize their favors and their talents that they do not know before, and they do not select this subject, if they have to study in the same curriculum as the other student.
Taking all aforementioned arguments into account leads us to the conclusion that selecting the materials is far better than the fixed curriculum, Not only student can save more time, and they can attend colleges as soon as possible, but also government can save more money.
- Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numbe 35
- Two years ago the city council voted to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. They claimed that skateboard users were responsible for litter and vandalism that were keeping other visitors from coming to the plaza. In the past two years, however, there 12
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, really, so, thus, apart from, in short, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15044247788 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75198315764 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569321533923 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6785869815 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251782229148 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904052573137 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885743800963 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1485053481 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381859657197 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.