A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
What we study in our early years, the way we learn creates the base for our future. The prompt suggests that all the denizens of a nation should be made to study the same national curriculum before their college. I mostly agree with this prompt for two reasons.
To begin, having a uniform curriculum across the entire nation would help in regulating the level of education that must be met before beginning college academics. For instance, few educational institutions raise the level of their curriculum in the early years, while few institutions have a lenient curriculum. When the students from all such institutions would get admitted to the same college, there would be a gap in the exposure that the individual students might have been subjected to. This would cause trouble to not only the students who have to cope up more to raise their bar but also for the professors who would have difficulty in making his lectures interesting for all the students. Having a same national curriculum would at least ensure a basic level of exposure amongst all the students.
However, as against subjects like Mathematics, Science and Literature which could be standardised across the nation, having a common curriculum for History, Geography would be difficult in a large country or secular country comprising of multiple cultures. Such countries would usually be divided into multiple states depending on their endemic cultures. In this regard, the stories, struggles of the leaders who might be very significant in a small sect, geographical importance for a particular region might not get a place in the national curriculum. This would partially defeat the purpose of effectively educating the population about its cultures. Perhaps, leaving the subjects which would pertain to the localities could be left to the state while the other subjects like Mathematics, Science, Literature which is factual could be standardised.
While some people might argue that the pedagogy matters as equally as the curriculum, at least ensuring an appropriate standard of the educational material could help in raising the bar for all the students and enabling them to grasp the advanced concepts without any issue.
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...t in a large country or secular country comprising of multiple cultures. Such countries would...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...ight argue that the pedagogy matters as equally as the curriculum, at least ensuring an ap...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, at least, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21971830986 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79220725323 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523943661972 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9585324843 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.357142857 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19591514863 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791600479979 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058155226444 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127138184152 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573467540056 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.