A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
This issue might seem logical, at a glance, it could be acceptable but lot of evidences are needed to review to establish the issue given as nation should consider all students study in a common national curriculum before access to the colleges. At a first look, it can be acceptable that have strong validity, or be weaker as it expected earlier. To clarify it, farther investigations as well as consultations with education professionals are inevitable.
In the first piece of evidence, it provides information that all schools should maintain same curriculum. It is necessary to learn common matter those are very important to every citizen. Each country, there are resources to be utilized in terms of wise use in different forms. Suppose, soil is very common resources and access to all. Everybody should have knowledge for production on farms, industries, etc. It is easy to learn and after learning inhabitants of any area can utilize. Similarly, forest resources, the natural asset should harvest through sustainable way. In this context, gathering common knowledge is very inevitable to citizens. On the other hand, developing country, like Bangladesh, has national curriculum for schools that was prescribed for 10-year education system for acquire common knowledge. Apparently, it takes long time to gain knowledge to common resource use. In the developed world, the primary schools adopted national curriculum for learning common matter. Subject to country status, it can be retained until primary education completion. It is the best measure to identify suitable students for appropriate field of study which will provide valuable outcome to the nations. The curriculum should also be very effective in considering use of the natural and other resources of the nation wise use.
In the second piece of evidence, all student should enter into college with subject choice. It takes long time to start in the field of specializations only five to eight years is enough for gathering common knowledge. In this aspect, introduction of model study or establishment of model schools are is badly needed to make experiments for suitable outcomes. There should not destroy 3-5 years to start for entering college with choice subject matter. To ensure a good start, we should primarily survey the exiting national curriculum and its merits and flaws. These should be in hand as standard to implement for the betterment of the nation. In this investigation, all students, teachers, education professionals, and different sectors involvement are needed. After through consultations with national stakeholders and international experts there should have standard structure to run education in the country.
Clearly, learning of common matter is an important issue for any nations but misuse of human resource and other resources are not permitted in terms of national resources use. Sectors involved in the field of education are must be realized this reality.
In conclusion, introduction of same national curriculum entire high school level is not necessary but it could be introduced in the primary or junior secondary stages to establish common learning issue. It might vary on the basis of resources, countries social and financial status and overall human resources to train-up. The motto should have a crystal-clear objective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 732, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sectors'' or 'sector's'?
Suggestion: sectors'; sector's
... education professionals, and different sectors involvement are needed. After through ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, look, second, similarly, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2835.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 522.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43103448276 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93378279985 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475095785441 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 893.7 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.043388962 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76666666667 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280497385408 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720857050679 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702143521778 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164895388435 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551794824318 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.