A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Conversation opened. 1 read message.
Skip to content
Using Gmail with screen readers
Search
Take me to Inbox
Gmail
COMPOSE
Labels
Inbox (922)
Starred
Important
Sent Mail
Drafts (5)
Circles
Notes
Personal
Travel
More labels
Hangouts
More
2 of 1,625
Print all In new window
hi
Inbox
x
shalin shah
Attachments1:23 PM (1 hour ago)
to shahshalin, me
uhhduifw
2 Attachments
Click here to Reply, Reply to all, or Forward
2.31 GB (15%) of 15 GB used
Manage
Terms - Privacy
Last account activity: 47 minutes ago
Details
People (2)
shalin shah
Add to circles
Show details
Students of any nation are its greatest assets, hence the curriculum decided for the students to study should be such that it gives optimum knowledge as well as inculcate the importance of culture within them. It is the students of today that would lead the country tomorrow. I strongly support that all the students should not have the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Any country is made up of many states each having varied and singular culture. Each state has its different culture, language, heritage and even different lifestyles. It is important for every student to know about its culture and heritage in order to preserve them. Nationalizing education until college would undermine preservation of cultural treasure of each state. For instance, a national curriculum would not include cultural history of Los Angeles, but the students of Los Angeles should definitively know about its cultural history.
Having said this, I also stand by the fact to nationalize education once they enter college. It is important to inculcate cultural values among students, once that is achieved then having the same national curriculum is a wise thing to do. Having the same national curricuclum would also have another disadvantage of forming a biased curriculum. The elected government who will decide the curricuclum may focus on their personal benefits and wishes rather than focusing on the future of all students. Education minister may include subjects that are pertinent to his own state. Such malign practices can be avoided if the state chooses its own curricuclum for its students.
On the other hand, nationalizing education can also give equality to all students. Some students can feel the subjects of other states easier than their's. This inequality of subjects can be removed by making one single curricuclum for all the students. Once all students all on equal level, the competition amongst would be
consisdered fair.
In the end, it is my opinion that the states should have the right to decide what subjects their students should study. It would be in the best interest of the students and ultimately the nation if all states have different curriculum until college for their students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- Scientists and researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 62
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 16
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 30
- 'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the c 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 24, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es Notes Personal Travel More labels Hangouts More 2 of 1,625 ...
^^^
Line 27, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onal Travel More labels Hangouts More 2 of 1,625 Print all In n...
^^^^^^
Line 29, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... More labels Hangouts More 2 of 1,625 Print all In new window...
^^^
Line 30, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Hangouts More 2 of 1,625 Print all In new window hi Inbox x ...
^^^^^^^
Line 35, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Print all In new window hi Inbox x shalin shah Attachments1:23 PM 1 hour a...
^^^^^
Line 40, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s1:23 PM 1 hour ago to shahshalin, me uhhduifw 2 Attachments Click he...
^^^
Line 42, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shahshalin, me uhhduifw 2 Attachments Click here to Reply, Reply to all, or Fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 52, column 8, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'shah' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'shahs'.
Suggestion: shahs
... minutes ago Details People 2 shalin shah Add to circles Show details St...
^^^^
Line 60, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in order to preserve them. Nationalizing education until college would undermine ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'for instance', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.296146044625 0.240241500013 123% => OK
Verbs: 0.135902636917 0.157235817809 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0872210953347 0.0880659088768 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0405679513185 0.0497285424764 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.052738336714 0.0444667217837 119% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0993914807302 0.12292977631 81% => OK
Participles: 0.0324543610548 0.0406280797675 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6888710472 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0304259634888 0.030933414821 98% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0933062880325 0.0997080785238 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0365111561866 0.0249443105267 146% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00811359026369 0.0148568991511 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2871.0 2732.02544248 105% => OK
No of words: 456.0 452.878318584 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.29605263158 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.392543859649 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.296052631579 0.280924506359 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.214912280702 0.200843997647 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116228070175 0.132149295362 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6888710472 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 219.290929204 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52850877193 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 61.7925131401 55.4138127331 112% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7272727273 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 152.098468812 59.4972553346 256% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 130.5 141.124799967 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 4.94800884956 243% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.21349557522 173% => OK
Readability: 50.3325358852 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.86725663717 1.64882698954 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49983118933 0.391690518653 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115881957935 0.123202303941 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0833138971212 0.077325440228 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.644174985046 0.547984918172 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.222752915634 0.149214159877 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155197130894 0.161403998019 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111410639741 0.0892212321368 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.116008090737 0.385218514788 30% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.157818341705 0.0692045440612 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153398193881 0.275328986314 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163698885892 0.0653680567796 250% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88274336283 225% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 9.0 2.70907079646 332% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.