A nation should require its students to study the same national curriculum until college.
A uniform curriculum might sound tempting at first as there are seemingly obvious benefits that can perhaps be linked to it. Some of them maybe that if everyone has had the same curiculum and taught the same things in school then noone is advantaged or disadvantaged by the curriculum when it comes to college applications or even grasping new concepts once college begins. It might become easier for college professors to design their courses this way and might even streamline the freshman year in college altogether.
However, before we are convinced by this illusion, we might want to look into some other arguments. Freedom in curriculum has helped in preserving local ideas for a long time. Reasoning and logic varies geographically in a country. These ideas are well represented only in local curriculums. Painting it with national common ideas might not be appropriate at all. A uniform curriculum might suppress certain ideologies or schools of thought.
Different curriculums help in creating a diversity in thought in the entire population. Students are taught different ways to approach the same problems. When these students come together and collaborate later in life, this difference in tackling problems is what engenders intellectual debate which results in newer ideas and more inclusive solutions. This is the true power of the youth. To give rise to the generation of next global thinkers, we need to guard the diversity in thought.
Moreover, if freedom of curriculum is snatched away from the schools, the teachers might also inevitably lose interest in what they are teaching. A fixed national curriculum might take out any scope of creative instruction and might render teaching repetitive and boring. It will create a wave of mindless parrotting and will result in no real benefits.
Additionally, imposing a national curriculum will also take out any scope for specialized and adaptive curriculums that are required by certain students. Such curriculums help students learn at their own pace - accelerated or slowed down. The idea behind everyone receiving the same kind of school education is flawed considering students have different needs.
Thus, Some extent of uniformity is required in the curriculum in a country but complete uniformity will do more bad than good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | mrigimunjal | 70 | view |
| 2019-03-06 | saharako | 66 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | Munaim Hossain | 50 | view |
- There are a lot of things one needs to know in order to evaluate the efficacy this move by the government. To begin with the basics, it is important to know just how high is the Vitamin A content in this new breed of millet and if it is actually effective 59
- Some tasks are for men only. 83
- ucial that the young understand this idea very well and the reasoning behind it very well. Instilling qualites like co-operation in them from an early age becomes very pressing. 58
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- Manned space flights should not be invested in. 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...youth. To give rise to the generation of next global thinkers, we need to guard t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, as for, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34426229508 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88774351029 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581967213115 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3142544465 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1428571429 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204314776054 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550807625508 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517784419989 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104470574554 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567468295933 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.