Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Make sure you consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
For several years and decades people have been exploiting our environment not just for economic purposes, they have also been exploiting nature for lucrative and selfish reasons. Nations passing a law in order to preserve the existing wilderness can be a step towards protecting the ecosystem as well as saving our planet for the future generations. Our planet does not exclusively belong to human beings, we are a part of an ecosystem and we share the planet earth with all the species of plants, trees, animals and insects. Although economic gain is good for the Nation, protecting our environment is the utmost important need of the hour.
It is said that about 99.9% of the species to ever exist on planet Earth are extinct and in the recent past, humans have been the reason for the extinction and endangerment of species from the ecosystem. With the advent of technology, the carbon footprint has increased leading to global warming. This in turn affects the habitat of animals across the planet which gives rise to the endangerment of many species. Human activities have also lead to the extinction of animals and plants. Ever since hunting and poaching have become illegal, the rates of extinction have reduced remarkably. During the pre-colonial and colonial periods of the British Government in India, a vast number of White Bengal Tigers were killed and their skins and teeth were sold for money. This has lead to the endangerment of the White Bengal Tigers in India. This is proof that laws help in preserving our environment.
Every single species play a pivotal role in our environment from ants to Elephants and from a rose plant to a banyan tree. Removing one from the ecosystem disrupts the cycle and hence becomes detrimental to our Planet Earth. The wilderness also help in producing rain and they produce oxygen which are vital for survival of all species including human beings. With the help of rains, the crop produce is more hence indirectly leading to economic growth.
These laws are long overdue and it is high time nations take such steps towards protecting our Environment. Not only would we be benefitted from these laws, our future generations and all the species found on planet Earth would be benefitted from them. Our ancestors might have left this planet in a bad condition for us, but we shouldn't leave a planet that is dying for our kids. Nature is the biggest wealth that we can leave for the next generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-18 | Mithra Kumar | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 50
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them 62
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain Make sure you consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequen 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...any species. Human activities have also lead to the extinction of animals and plants...
^^^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...lanet in a bad condition for us, but we shouldnt leave a planet that is dying for our ki...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90625 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56396421402 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495192307692 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6741625605 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.05 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115998999419 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387447628122 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426644700524 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763956925258 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456354352969 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.