The commonplace suggests that economic development is antithetical to environment protection. Throughout history, this view has been constructed upon a myriad of deleterious impacts resulted from human activity. Nowadays, preserving the environment at all cost has become a politically correct opinion that can be used to justify any measure without depending on an evidence-based method. Therefore, the sole existence of a wilderness area is not enough to justify any legal mechanism that has the potential to harm a country's economy.
The awakening to environmental awareness arose in developed nations during the second half of the 20th Century. What initially started as a noble-intended reflection upon the industrial revolution, along with its consequences, has become a profitable business. Governments have been passing more and more strict laws to create a wide range of difficulties in order to increase their revenues effortlessly through fines and questionable requirements for business practice. Nonetheless, such complex laws have created an enormous demand for environmental consultants that thrive by helping companies to navigate through this ever complex legal system.
Generally speaking, developing nations do not count on the resources, nor the expertise to design and implement sustainable measures. For the most part, they must hire specialists from developed nations to advise and certify every stage of the process. Not only it means more money flying from the Third to the First World, but it also works a subtle mechanism to reinforce the hegemony of the latter. Arguably, developed nations do not want competitors. For them, nothing can be more convenient than the long-standing geopolitical system in which emerging countries exchange primary products for cheap (such as agricultural outputs) for much more expensive manufactured goods (e.g., computers, cars, medical equipment). To sum up, why should developing nations develop?
On the other hand, most of the natural beauties and ecological diversity still in existence happens to be in developing nations. If they follow the same path than their wealthier counterparts, the result will invariably be a colossal disaster. Studies suggest that rain forests play a crucial role in the maintenance of water supply thousands of miles away from its footprint. In addition to that, the steady rise in the average Earth's temperature has been aligned with the predictions of global warming specialists from the past. Consequently, there must be laws and ordinances to address this serious issue, but they should never condemn a country's future neither become an incentive for indecorous practices.
For example, corruption levels in Brazil are relatively high in all sectors of society when compared to other countries. Brazil is also known for its magnificent nature and national parks. Even though Brazil has one of the most rigorous environmental legislation in the world, the number of environmental crimes are incredibly high. In a country where individuals can hardly establish a productive relationship with the government without bribery, laws can be used by officials to sell any conveniences. The tragedy that took place in the city of Mariana in 2015 is a crystal-clear image of that: strict environmental laws could not manage to prevent the most significant environmental tragedy in Brazil's history.
All in all, legal measure to protect the environment can eventually preclude a developing nation to use the full potential of their territory to leverage their economies and, ultimately, the standards of living of their citizens. Though lawmakers should never abandon this approach, laws must be designed to solve more problems than they create.
- A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertising 23
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelli 33
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.(3) 66
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 75
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e potential to harm a countrys economy. The awakening to environmental awareness...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 715, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vironmental tragedy in Brazils history. All in all, legal measure to protect the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o solve more problems than they create.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, e.g., first, if, nonetheless, second, so, still, therefore, third, for example, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3185.0 2235.4752809 142% => OK
No of words: 570.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58771929825 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09606378442 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 330.0 215.323595506 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 995.4 704.065955056 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9888892981 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.96153846154 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231529598259 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577606208199 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367623856151 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109944989324 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228531275 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 188.0 100.480337079 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.