Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The statement advocates that nation should preserve the remaining wilderness, rather using the land for economic benefit. I strongly agree, with the statement that all the nations together should join hands to save the forests and the wild areas.
Firstly, the forests are an abundant source of oxygen to the planet earth. The forests are a primary reason to why the planet is still a habitable place to live. For instance, Amazon Rainforest provide more than twenty percent of oxygen in the world; if the we start using this forest to build houses, industries and ectra, then it would not be long when the inhabitants of the plant are on its brink. Moreover, forest are an important to the wildlife; a lot of animals are dependent on the wild to surive. The animals live, thrive, die and hunt in their home. If we take their homes, they all would die out.
Secondly, We have already cut majority of the forests to fulfil our extravagant needs; now cutting more forest to do the same would only make the planet to collapse. The Deforestation has led to global warming; the forests are a main source to control the temperature of the planet, yet we did not hesitate before cutting them. From the past hundered years the temperature of the planet has risen by ten degrees; this rise in tempeature has caused glacier to melt and wild-life to lose its animals. Ozone layer depletion has started because of global warming. The depletion has put animals and humans to risk to cancer.
However, Opponents could agrue that with rising the population, we need more land to give home and give jobs. The population is one of the primary reasons why the forests are cut, but should we noble citizen our nation should preserve our wilderness? Cutting forest would soon cause the planet to die. Instead, we should impose population control on the nations and to support the scheme, we should give perks to the citizens who follow them like how China is doing with its citizens.
In sum, saving the forests are important to the plants and its people. We could encourge to engender the forest growth and not disturb its natural habitat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 58
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'we'?
Suggestion: the; we
...enty percent of oxygen in the world; if the we start using this forest to build houses...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78648648649 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37687452455 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532432432432 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.499940641 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2105263158 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4736842105 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941263836869 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320096562169 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472934883344 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637950706567 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497230433714 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.