Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Some people think that countries and governments must pass a statute regarding preserving natural resources and wild nature. Others people, however, argue that not only nations should be, but also, laities is responsible for. I agree with the latter statement and present the following reasons to support my point of view.
First of all, the Environmental issues like as: pollution, climate change, and global warming, and so forth happen due to human is not care about your habitat. Our habitat is nature and depends heavily upon nature health and wilderness areas where is necessary for living things that are a binding factor for us. If not, we adulterate your home and would have to choose an others areas for living there. In Addition, we need animals and plants for our facile living because of those are our feeds, arteries, pulmonary organs. Therefore, cutting living things off our lives is a big mistake for everyone and pass a firm law could be effective for natural health and our descendant.
Second, every action in which it preserves any remaining areas is successful in want of an austere discipline. The intergovernmental establishment such as United Nation (UN) and The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)-it is a governmental and non-governmental organization- are responsible for it. Since it is both governmental and civil society and corporation between it is useful for environmental. The IUCN attempt to preserve the living things that have a danger of extinct and has been published a list of in dangerous species like as fish, mammals, plants, and so on that are inhibited hunting, selling, also barring entering everyone to habitat those species are living there. Furthermore, we should provide a new discipline for study and edifying laity for nature conservation so that the people are warned about your environmental. Thus, it is an issue involving such a lot of factors: political, economic, and cultural that we attempt to associate it together.
You might argue that some countries like as developing kind are neglected in other countries rights for healthy environmental, for example, UNITED STATES cut off the Paris agreement to get more money and produce more pollution. However, the more countries are allegiance to the convention and produce less distributable materials but wilderness area day-to-day is confined and is affected by such an issue. Others might cite, the attempt is an adequate amount for conservation. But, we see no matter how much spending money for environmental conservation is a good investment for our descendant. Therefore, we must attempt in climax manner in the restoration of wild nature.
In summary, I believe, everyone in our world is responsible for wilderness areas. Therefore, I strongly support cooperation between governmental and civil society to establish a rigid statute for environmental conservation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in addition, in summary, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2447.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31956521739 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06836024508 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539130434783 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 780.3 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3091205376 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.523809524 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9047619048 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145338529439 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461932911973 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429494308515 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885179901062 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416195526849 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.