No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Although it sounds extreme when author claims that ant field of study can make progress “only” with the help of outsiders of the field, for the most part, I agree with the author in that professionals from outside the field can make a significant contribution to the progress of a field of study such as business, politics and arts.
First, in the realm of business, it is very common to observe many professionals outside of business are brought into business field. For instance, in an effort to increase the sales revenue, many companies assiduously finds a way to understand minds of consumers by employing psychologists for their marketing research departments. Through the study of the psychology of consumers, the advancement of study of marketing strategy can significantly improve. Additionally, in preparation to protect companies from various liability issues, many companies hire their own company attorneys so that attorneys can study the ways to protect the company from possible loss through any lawsuits. The involvement of these outside professionals made it possible to advance not only practical progress but also academic progress in marketing strategy or commercial legal aspects.
The realm of politics is the area that involves the most professionals outside this field because public leaders have to deal with a diverse issues and problems domestically and internationally. In order to be an effective policy maker and to exercise great leadership, the leader has to have a thorough understanding of the needs of the people in the country. However, as leader is not perfect, he will need a help from many professionals such as environmentalists, scientists, experts of international relationships, Asia or Europe and even translators so that he could communicate with the leaders from other countries.
One might claim that certain field such as art is not in need of help of outsiders. For examples, musicians, painters or photographers can easily advance the field of arts only with their own expertise and skills. However, it is inevitable for even the artists to rely on other professionals at times. For instance, in the study of ancient arts or the arts where the origin of which are ambiguous, it is inevitable to resort to archeologists or other professionals that can scientifically examine the materials or condition of the arts to detect their origin.
In sum, as complicated as world is, one problem or one aspect of field cannot be studied by excluding other factors that affect the field. For this reason, involvement of professionals outside the field will not only contribute to the expansion of the views on a subject but also bring a synergy effect in further advancing the growth of the field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | smithsonite79 | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Kyunghwan Kim | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | FaylEAVE0920 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | tuktuki1311 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | wwwww | 66 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- TOEFL integrated writing: Chaco housing 3
- TOEFL integrated writing: work a four-day week. 3
- The pie charts below show the most common advantages and disadvantages of Bowen Island according to a survey of visitors
- dinosaurs endotherm 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, as to, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2315.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22573363431 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18457439808 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474040632054 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5807229151 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.333333333 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5333333333 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317458675648 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108310047895 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921415452888 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195534652642 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934402354737 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.