Art should be free of any strains to be innovative, so we cannot judge the merit of the art by being understandable for most people. In my opinion, art loses its value when it becomes straightforward and transparent.
Serious art should not be easily interpreted, not even have one valid interpretation. Moreover, while you can say a lot about an art piece, much should remain unsayable. Real art attracts people by touching their souls and reviving their thoughts, even if they cannot comprehend the real intentions of the artist. For example, the Monaliza painting still infinitely enigmatic, while there are many interpretations trying to enrich our understanding of Leonardo's piece of art, no defined answer found to be valid enough. This what is making all the fuss about the Monaliza, and attracting thousands of people to come from all the world to stand in front of it, and make their own perceptions of her smile. So, in order for any work of art to be innovative, it should incite our imagination, feelings, and memories in our way to percept it.
Thus, persuading artists to promote accessible virtues to their ideas might cause them to produce a lot of guff, which would be repetitive and monotonous. Artists mostly have complex and contradictional ideas and feelings, what make them novel is their ability to express their ideas in artistic ways, either through novels, films, poems. Asking artists to be more understandable to most of the people will lessen impede their creativity and deter their inspiration. For instance, if an artist can give a stated explanation of his work, people will consider him naive and worthless, we can see many direct portraits around which do not spark our attention, and many artworks failed because they were predictable. In contrary, the eminent artworks which keep people wondering and perplexed become outstanding merit.
On the other hand, too complicated artworks which could be esoteric would be uninteresting for people. Artists should not build barriers between them and people, this would hinder art's crucial role in reflecting society's cultural, traditions, and values, furthermore, preserving them through the history. For instance, many esoteric art pieces were neglected by people because they were unnecessarily complex. So, it is important for art to be reasonable to people's understanding and could be comprehensible for future generations who will receive their history through the art.
In conclusion, while art should not be exclusive and prestigious, it will lose its value when it is straightforward and predictable. People are more interested in artistic works which entice their curiosity and stimulate their thoughts, so it is not fair for art to expect it to be a commonplace.
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 50
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 66
- many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 88
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species. 50
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... art to expect it to be a commonplace.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2321.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22747747748 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01329046832 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536036036036 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8157817474 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.157894737 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3684210526 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311119439639 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105832668871 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930257502052 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203765543801 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724574951027 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.