In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Obscure and sophisticated art has always been acknowledged and termed meritorious regardless of how the people understand it.
For generations, scholars have been studying art which are revered and termed timeless. Legendary works always attract more attention which not only lasts for its time but continues to inspire the future generation. But why is it that these works are more influential than other ordinary ones? Why is it that even till this date schools all around the world include Shakespeare’s plays in their curriculum? Or scholars create new interpretations of the poems written by Yeats? These works possess the finesse and novelty which gives them ascendance over other contemporary works. Such works are a class apart, and if a common man is unable to comprehend it, it does not undermine its merit in any way.
Secondly, major works of art are usually the ones which are idiosyncratic and uncategorical. They usually remain enigmatic to most and even generations to come. Not everyone has a taste for exquisite art, in fact many people are aloof to majority of the fine distinctions which a particular piece of work portrays. To really appreciate and merit art, one needs to understand the time, society,culture in which it was created. For example, knowing the life of the legendary artist Frieda Kahlo is crucial for understanding her works. A person who does not know what kind of suffering she went through or how women were treated at that time, will clearly not understand the depth in her works- and yet it remains one of the most revered and appreciated works.
All forms of art are influential to the society and they play a pivotal role in showcasing something very significant at that point of creation. For example contemporary peoms and films which illustrate the attrocities faced by women in the society or about goverment corruption would widely influence people. Although, convoluted works would preclude the people from understanding and gaining insights of what the author is interested in portraying. And this would gainsay people’s awareness.
Art has always been about creativity and novelty. The onus lies on the viewers to understand the depth and message conveyed by the creators. Would we call it art if it was so simple and outright?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-03 | Sakshi Kasture | 50 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | Sakshi Kasture | 50 | view |
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 62
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 42
- The city council of Town X has proposed reducing the city's electric expenses by switching all the lights in public building from incandescent bulbs to light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs burn ou 43
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 66
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 393, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , culture
...ne needs to understand the time, society,culture in which it was created. For example, k...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...knowing the life of the legendary artist Frieda Kahlo is crucial for understandin...
^^
Line 8, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnificant at that point of creation. For example contemporary peoms and films whi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, second, secondly, so, for example, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14933333333 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96042519469 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562666666667 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1408931477 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9523809524 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2380952381 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277848702867 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716350313683 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503209275222 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128627448806 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584553238586 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.