In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.
The author of the statement claims that in order to become an all-rounder in all the fields. college must take other courses. Many of us will argue that this will hold all the time will others will counter this. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
As we know education plays a major role in shaping the career of students. They provide opportunities to the student to study what they want to and allow them to pursue their favorite or interested field. but as we know 21st-century industries demand that they required a candidate who has knowledge of other subjects other than their field, for example, a civil engineer must have a knowledge of computer and related software. The author also recommended that an individual can become an all-rounder by taking courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.
We have seen that by reading books, novel, mythology, many became well-rounded individuals, for example, JP Oppenheimer how gave nuclear bomb to the world once stated in his interview that he reed the Hindu mythology book Bhagvat Geet and learn many things from the book teachings, which were very helpful for him while developing the nuclear bomb. So, if one study other courses like mentioned above another their major field than it would help them and they can use their learning from these course in their field or other.
However, we can not ignore a fact that we are living in a society where we do a lot of work through technology, form talking friends or family who are far away from us or by reaching office by driving the car, we are surrounded by the technology. And if one wants to learn other things they can use the advantage of living in the technology-oriented world and become good in other fields also, for example, if a person working for the non-technical firm: a firm that does not require the usage of software and suddenly his boss asks him to make the ppt for the client. In this case, he can learn how to make ppt through a platform like youtube or any other digital platform and this the best way to learn in minimum time. So, this is just a basic example, we many other examples who will challenge the author's claim.
Last but not the least, if not use technology or not even study course that including reading and many more, even then also we can successful became all-rounder, here I will quote the example of Apple founder Steve Jobs, who gave a speech regarding the connecting dots during the graduation day in Stanford University, he said that he dropped the college and start learning calligraphy and then he starts focusing on his start-up name as Apple, but when he was removed as the CEO of the company he founded another company that makes animated films and here he uses the calligraphic skill that he learned. So, here I mentioned this example just to show that if study anything, not the subject that recommended by the author then also you can become an all-rounder.
In sum, as mentioned above yes we can become an all-rounder by taking courses in which we read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature, but that does not mean that this is the only way to do, there are several other ways to achieve knowledge of other fields.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-01-28 | Simone23456789 | 66 | view |
2024-01-28 | Simone23456789 | 66 | view |
2023-09-21 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 62 | view |
2023-09-09 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
2023-08-06 | Fortune Quarshie | 50 | view |
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free 50
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 62
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: College
...ecome an all-rounder in all the fields. college must take other courses. Many of us wil...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rovide sound reasoning for the same. As we know education plays a major role in...
^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...sue their favorite or interested field. but as we know 21st-century industries dema...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these course in their field or other. However, we can not ignore a fact that ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uthors claim. Last but not the least, if not use technology or not even study ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, then, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 70.0 33.0505617978 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2760.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 585.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71794871795 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9180050066 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57642962774 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473504273504 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 863.1 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 134.870359386 60.3974514979 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.352941176 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4117647059 23.4991977007 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235491691093 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085477226323 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813465263128 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135900947005 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717232917423 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.8420337079 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.