Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
To discuss that the originality comes from old ideas mixed together to bring new ones, that definitly true. We have a lot of examples around us shows that authenticity doesn’t come only from a never thought thing, however, it could be form somethimg that has been existed before but had some edit or evolve to be another thing. For example, invention the telephone, this example has the two faces of the prompt. The first, that this invention before it came to exist, there was no any one create such invention. Before AS who the first one invented the telephone in 1425, no one had thought to invent it before him. This is a novelity, however, this is not the end if this invention, as we know what we have now in the modern life another version of the telephone. Here comes the seoncd face of the prompt, that the originality comes from old ideas have put together to generate some new ideas. Upon the previous example, the telephone what we have today is compeletly differ from what had invented perviously. The latest one is more sophisticated and has more options and technology. Of course, because of invented the old one, that helped in creating and thinking to realese more ideas about phones. Before, telephone was big and not protable, now it is protable and easy to carry everywhere. The new versions of telephone are original and have their authenticity althoug they have been created from old ideas.
Another example, Tesla the autodrive cars. This also a new version from old one has been invented in3232. However, no one can deny the role of evolution that Elon Mask has added to that invention. Moreover, no one can say that Elon Mask deosn’t have the authenticity og generating such new generation of cars. Although cars are not new ideas, what we have todays are considered new ideas and have their own thinking possession. However, the person who had invented it before had the originality of creating the cars till now and no one never forget his virtue on evolving the cars realm nowadays.
In coclusion, The above examples show that the originalty not only putting old ideas to bring new ones, but it is also could be a new thinking that never had been thoughts. Both are regarded as originality.
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time 76
- Important truths begin as outrageous or at least uncomfortable attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time 58
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 58
- CLAIM Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills REASON These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 479, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...tion before it came to exist, there was no any one create such invention. Before A...
^^
Line 1, column 482, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...n before it came to exist, there was no any one create such invention. Before AS who th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, another thing, as to, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52078589245 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45618556701 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2243854786 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.15 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209032842161 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690502735524 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687623053324 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166464239828 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348065428072 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.