Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
Originality can have different meanings but certainly, it cannot be restrained to something that is completely new or was never thought of by someone else before. Hence, I partly agree with the prompt that originality means amassing old ideas in varying ways to generate new thoughts while considering that one’s pure thinking should also be regarded as original.
Admittedly, people’s unique perceptions about something can be considered as original. For example, the invention of the steam engine shows us how an individual’s view can produce a great discovery. Though scientists knew the power of steam, it was only James watt whose view about steam led to the creation of the steam engine. No one perceives the might of steam like him and no one ever thought of using the potential of steam like him. Another significant example could be the invention of gravity by Newton. We all know that things fall when we throw them higher but Newton found the cause behind this ordinary phenomenon and his thinking brought a drastic change in the realm of science. The discovery of gravitational force paved the way for lunar exploration and so much more. Therefore, it can be said that originality suggests something that was never thought of the way it is now.
But the definition of originality cannot be restricted to this view only. Originality can also refer to something that is generated by viewing old ideas in a different way. The music industry could be a great example of this notion. Nowadays many music composers are using old music in their compositions to create fusion. Therefore, portraying the old music in a new way or the way the present audience would like to enjoy the old songs. By doing so, they also help to conserve the heritage of music. You can also consider the automobile industry as an example. The latest cars we use are actually made in compliance with some basic principles that were also used in the first car. Does that mean we are using the copied cars? Obviously not rather the present cars are more developed and new technologies are added to make these cars more comfortable and reliable. Furthermore, different companies make different cars and they are all unique in their own way. Similarly, the internet we are using now was never like this before. Internet was first used by the US military and over the course of time, it is refined to become reasonable for public use. So, it is the old internet but in a very unique way.
To sum up, the definition of originality should not be restricted to a particular view because it does have different meanings. Gathering the previous inventions in order to generate something new is original at the same time the unique perception of a man is also original.
- Political leaders should withhold information from the public 50
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice for a client Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last heating season that regi 58
- The charts bleow give information about the electricity generation in two countries in 2009 73
- A national curriculum for schools 79
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: MODAL_OF[1]
Message: It's never correct to use "of" after a modal verb. Use 'might have', or, in informal register, 'might've'.
Suggestion: might have; might've
... the steam engine. No one perceives the might of steam like him and no one ever thought ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... that is generated by viewing old ideas in a different way. The music industry could be a great ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...on. Therefore, portraying the old music in a new way or the way the present audience would l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1190, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...se. So, it is the old internet but in a very unique way. To sum up, the definition of orig...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, similarly, so, therefore, while, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85319148936 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71418069076 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493617021277 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0554339763 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7307692308 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11538461538 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288919957943 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797077360801 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091497910707 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203526764435 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117280655812 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: MODAL_OF[1]
Message: It's never correct to use "of" after a modal verb. Use 'might have', or, in informal register, 'might've'.
Suggestion: might have; might've
... the steam engine. No one perceives the might of steam like him and no one ever thought ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... that is generated by viewing old ideas in a different way. The music industry could be a great ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...on. Therefore, portraying the old music in a new way or the way the present audience would l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1190, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...se. So, it is the old internet but in a very unique way. To sum up, the definition of orig...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, similarly, so, therefore, while, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85319148936 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71418069076 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493617021277 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0554339763 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7307692308 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11538461538 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288919957943 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797077360801 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091497910707 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203526764435 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117280655812 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.