Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
Originality is key to the success in each and every field of career. But the definition of originality may vary person to person, it is nothing but creating new, interesting and innovative things. So it does not matter if the new ideas are coming from taking the inspiration from old ideas or recreating old ideas with new vision or without taking any help from any other sources as long as there is something new or something creative. So the statement here saying that originality is not always thinking about something never thought before, but also putting old ideas together in new ways is the one that I agree with.
Some of the example supporting this is fashion industry. Most of the fashion designers today are encouraged by old fashion creating new looks using old one. New style of clothing is trending in market if fusion style which is again inspired by old fashion mixing old style with new style when put together to create whole new style of clothing. This is another example of creating something original inspired by old ideas.
Another example of putting old things in new ways is Quantum Physics and science. Most of the theories in quantum physic are inspired by challenging the old proven theories which some time leads to whole new concept proving another theory or creating a new theory. There are also some inventions which are not based on old ideas but the things was never done before. One of the example is steam engine. When steam engine was invented no one could have thought that steam can be used in a machine which can be then used to travel from one place to another.
Music industry is another example of such thing. In today’s date most of the musicians are recreating the old songs with addition of new lyrics and new advancing the music with new instruments. This is another way of putting old traditional music in front of people so that new generation will have the knowledge the old songs in a whole new way.
So in short, one cannot judge originality if it is inspired by old thing or recreating the old fashion or even if by challenging the old facts. There is large difference in copying thing and inspired by old thing. So as long as no one is copying anything everything is original, creative and innovative in its own way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | amruta3097 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | nkuruppath641@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | nkuruppath641@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | mb94 | 33 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | devjoshi | 57 | view |
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 58
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive because it is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ew ways is the one that I agree with. Some of the example supporting this is fashion indu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re. One of the example is steam engine. When steam engine was invented no one could ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, as to, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68656716418 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49837946537 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430348258706 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4139260324 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1578947368 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68421052632 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313224538918 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101449999577 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924344155711 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18177133496 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948249220324 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.