It is said that lazy humans promote the development of technology, which is similar to today’s statement that human’s thinking degradation results from the stronger reliance on technology to solve problems. However, it is a paradox that new technology itself is at the same time created and developed by human thinking. Therefore, from my point of view, the statement is unconvincing without taking other circumstances into account.
On one hand, some simple and repetitive tasks are indeed completely replaced and solved by the increasingly developed technology under this society which was largely influence by globalization. For example, the delivery system in Amazon’s warehouse is in the charge of robots. There is no human intervention after the coding is designed and the administrator need not to worry about the task arrangement, package dispensation and warehouse inventory, which absolutely saves the cost of time and human.
One the other hand, we are relied more and more on technology because of the high efficacy and efficiency. Let’s go back to 1990‘s, data analysis or information collection, such as calculating the salary after tax for each employee, would cost an account one week. However, using the computer and latest software, it only took him or her several minutes. The development of technology help us to overcome the hurdles of calculation speed, limited human vigor and human caused errors.
Admittedly, human thinking deteriorates to some extent because we are encouraged to use instruments without knowing the theory of the instrument. It is true that the most basic requirement for us is to put instruments, theories and experience into practice. When the bulb was suddenly shut down, we may know that we can use a voltmeter to confirm and to fix it but we don’t further think about why the bulb was shut down. Is it because the total volt in house is out of the limit? Does the shutdown come from human caused error or the storm outside? Most of the time we don’t ask questions behind the issues which caused the degradation of our mind.
However, I still claim that technology also promotes human thinking because of the technology revolution. When the researchers deeply explored the old technology and found something new, they will design and create new technology; For instance, human society only had trains driven by coal several hundred years ago, then we had steam trains, and finally we have new trains driven by new energy. Our society also steps forward from the first industrial revolution to maybe the third industrial revolution in the near future. It is a cycle to push the society became more and more modernized. Therefore, how can I agree with the statement that human’s ability of thinking is deteriorating based on the facts listed above?
In conclusion, although the technology revolution help us to solve so many issues, instead of degradation, our thinking ability are promoted not only because of the update of old technology, but also the new technology created to solve new problems, such as pollution, waste disposal and so on.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reason 83
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worry'?
Suggestion: worry
...designed and the administrator need not to worry about the task arrangement, package dis...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
...d human. One the other hand, we are rely more and more on technology because of ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 31, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'deteriorated'.
Suggestion: deteriorated
... errors. Admittedly, human thinking is deteriorate to some extent because we are encourage...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, may, so, still, then, therefore, third, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2638.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20315581854 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94506314041 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526627218935 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 845.1 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8259749236 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.909090909 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0454545455 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21818996244 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637554140395 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528929417532 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114360749682 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303257496772 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.