As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the modern world, people often rely on recent technologies, digital or mechanical, to sustain their daily lives. Frequently, technologies are replacing human intelligence in tasks which, in previous centuries, most human beings were able to manage for themselves. Many skeptic are concerned that human may have been losing the ability to reason and solve problems. They maintain that as the necessity to discern, calculate, or memorize dissipates, human ability to do so may be effaced as well.
Considering how this society has used the boon of technology, however, one can clearly see that human ability to reason will only evolve, but not deteriorate. Although it is true that there exist a few tasks that people do not have to perform for themselves anymore, such as memorizing a friend’s phone number or a driving route to the friend’s house, it requires more intelligence for humans to invent and learn the usage of such tools - iPhone or GPS - that provide such conveniences.
In addition, thanks to the progress in science and technology, a range of everyday life for an average person has increased astonishingly in the past century. Modern people experience far more events in much more various spaces in a shorter period of time than their ancestors would have, traveling conveniently with modern transportation system, or even getting informations from the places they have never visited through internet.
The statement given plausibly pointed out that their are certain functions of human brain that are not required anymore due to the brilliant accomplishment of scientists and engineers. However, since there exist a number of more advanced skills that human brains are required to learn in order to properly utilize cutting-edge technologies, and the same technologies allow more diverse and wealthy information to flow into human brains as input, it is hard to conclude that technologies may let human ability deteriorate. Rather, as people rely more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will improve and adapt for higher tasks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | mckvabhishek | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | Amey Waghmode | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | rhassan | 16 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | Pujan Biswas | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | Pujan Biswas | 66 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 50
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 50
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora."Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora's citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all of Corpora's citizens 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bility to do so may be effaced as well. Considering how this society has used th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...n much more various spaces in a shorter period of time than their ancestors would have, travel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...tement given plausibly pointed out that their are certain functions of human brain th...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'well', 'in addition', 'such as', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.219576719577 0.240241500013 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.164021164021 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.113756613757 0.0880659088768 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0687830687831 0.0497285424764 138% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0291005291005 0.0444667217837 65% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116402116402 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.042328042328 0.0406280797675 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96130653266 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0449735449735 0.030933414821 145% => OK
Particles: 0.0026455026455 0.0016655270985 159% => OK
Determiners: 0.0555555555556 0.0997080785238 56% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0185185185185 0.0249443105267 74% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0132275132275 0.0148568991511 89% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2112.0 2732.02544248 77% => OK
No of words: 336.0 452.878318584 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.28571428571 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.392857142857 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28869047619 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196428571429 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145833333333 0.132149295362 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96130653266 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 219.290929204 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580357142857 0.48968727796 119% => OK
Word variations: 65.056101112 55.4138127331 117% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 30.5454545455 23.380412469 131% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.3940522123 59.4972553346 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 192.0 141.124799967 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5454545455 23.380412469 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 0.674092028746 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 59.4145021645 51.4728631049 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.44444444444 1.64882698954 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478070625921 0.391690518653 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106024951931 0.123202303941 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0400687736222 0.077325440228 52% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.612310851139 0.547984918172 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12265771342 0.149214159877 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229302677872 0.161403998019 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11804029802 0.0892212321368 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.217472247635 0.385218514788 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0601361222834 0.0692045440612 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322735612313 0.275328986314 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076316661207 0.0653680567796 117% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.